• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Perfect Tan not perfect sponsor for UFC

May 10, 2015 by Jason Cruz 1 Comment

Sam Alvey and his tanning sponsor, Perfect Tan, will no longer be able to work around the UFC’s sponsor rules according to the organization.  UFC exec Tom Wright indicated that Alvey’s “#PerfectTan” that he had spray-tanned on his chest this past Saturday at UFC Fight Night 65 was against the UFC’s sponsor rules.

Wright stated at the post-fight press conference that “Fighters definitely can’t do that.”  Wright referred to the sponsor name tanned into Alvey’s chest which was first revealed at the weigh-ins the day before his fight with Daniel Kelly.

UFC sponsorship is a controversial subject considering fighters, like Alvey, will no longer be able to solicit sponsors starting this July when Reebok takes over as the official clothing sponsor for the UFC.  Last week, the company revealed the sponsorship pay structures.

You can see a pic of the offending sponsor at MMA Fighting.

No word if Alvey will be punished for his actions.

Payout Perspective:

Alvey’s sponsor stunt is reminiscent of days that boxers were paid to wear GoldenPalace.com on their backs.  Of course, those were written on their backs and not spray-tanned onto Alvey’s skin.  If you think about it, Alvey’s actions were “perfect” as the UFC could not really tell Alvey at the weigh-ins (although Wright states the UFC did not notice until before the fight) to get rid of the sponsor if it was tanned into his skin.  Moreover, the sponsorship tied into the company since it deals with tanning.  Not sure the benefit of a hashtag rather than just including the web site of the company.  Look for the UFC to issue a reminder to its fighters that it cannot do this.  Hopefully for Alvey, he is not subject to a monetary fine.

Filed Under: sponsorships, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. BrainSmasher says

    May 11, 2015 at 11:44 am

    I would have pulled him from the fight. He is stupid for risking his fight. He may have also lost $50,000 for performance pay because of this. He got a finish and even if they would have given it to him. You know they are not with him breaking the sponsor rules. If they would have pulled him. He would likely have lost or had to pay back the Tan sponsor as well as lost fight pay and reebok pay. It didn’t make any sense to do this when the sponsor pay couldn’t have been much given his level in the UFC and it being a fight pass card. He basically risked 100,000 and his career for what $5,000? Stupid!

    Judging by his proclaimed love for Reebok in the post fight interview. I would bet he got his ass chewed pretty good.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Judge denies CSI Entertainment’s Temporary Restraining Order

Mayweather-CSI Entertainment legal drama heats up

Mayweather legal saga continues as CSI Entertainment continues to pursue injunction

Mayweather boxing exhibition in Greece cancelled

Mayweather responds to CSI Entertainment Injunction request

Injunction filed against Mayweather from fighting this Saturday

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Mayweather-CSI Entertainment legal drama heats up #boxing #sportslaw https://mmapayout.com/2026/07/01/mayweather-csi-entertainment-legal-drama-heats-up/

There are no rules…

Paul Gift @MMAanalytics

You can write to a judge about someone committing perjury? I didn’t know you could do that. Would’ve been good to know.

My wife says the same to me every day 😜

Megan @Megan_O_32

FUCK YOU JASON

I hope every time you cough or sneeze you pee yourself.

They should have a statute of his agent somewhere

Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter

Happy Bobby Bonilla Deferral Day: Bonilla is set to collect another $1.193 million from the New York Mets today, as he will each July 1st through the year 2035.

#Mayweather attorneys respond with 2 letters

4

MMA Payout @MMAPayout

Here we go, Judd Burstein accuses Floyd #Mayweather of perjury. The CSI Entertainment-Mayweather lawsuit going to heat up. Any thought the parties were going to work together amicably was barking up the wrong tree. #boxing #SportsLaw

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports