• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Perfect Tan not perfect sponsor for UFC

May 10, 2015 by Jason Cruz 1 Comment

Sam Alvey and his tanning sponsor, Perfect Tan, will no longer be able to work around the UFC’s sponsor rules according to the organization.  UFC exec Tom Wright indicated that Alvey’s “#PerfectTan” that he had spray-tanned on his chest this past Saturday at UFC Fight Night 65 was against the UFC’s sponsor rules.

Wright stated at the post-fight press conference that “Fighters definitely can’t do that.”  Wright referred to the sponsor name tanned into Alvey’s chest which was first revealed at the weigh-ins the day before his fight with Daniel Kelly.

UFC sponsorship is a controversial subject considering fighters, like Alvey, will no longer be able to solicit sponsors starting this July when Reebok takes over as the official clothing sponsor for the UFC.  Last week, the company revealed the sponsorship pay structures.

You can see a pic of the offending sponsor at MMA Fighting.

No word if Alvey will be punished for his actions.

Payout Perspective:

Alvey’s sponsor stunt is reminiscent of days that boxers were paid to wear GoldenPalace.com on their backs.  Of course, those were written on their backs and not spray-tanned onto Alvey’s skin.  If you think about it, Alvey’s actions were “perfect” as the UFC could not really tell Alvey at the weigh-ins (although Wright states the UFC did not notice until before the fight) to get rid of the sponsor if it was tanned into his skin.  Moreover, the sponsorship tied into the company since it deals with tanning.  Not sure the benefit of a hashtag rather than just including the web site of the company.  Look for the UFC to issue a reminder to its fighters that it cannot do this.  Hopefully for Alvey, he is not subject to a monetary fine.

Filed Under: sponsorships, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. BrainSmasher says

    May 11, 2015 at 11:44 am

    I would have pulled him from the fight. He is stupid for risking his fight. He may have also lost $50,000 for performance pay because of this. He got a finish and even if they would have given it to him. You know they are not with him breaking the sponsor rules. If they would have pulled him. He would likely have lost or had to pay back the Tan sponsor as well as lost fight pay and reebok pay. It didn’t make any sense to do this when the sponsor pay couldn’t have been much given his level in the UFC and it being a fight pass card. He basically risked 100,000 and his career for what $5,000? Stupid!

    Judging by his proclaimed love for Reebok in the post fight interview. I would bet he got his ass chewed pretty good.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Conor McGregor returns July 11th

Keane’s attorneys fire back at Top Rank based on undiscovered evidence

White writes letter to Trump requesting change to law

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Da fuq? Didn’t they already know this?

WrestlePurists @WrestlePurists

During today's WWE Town Hall, Nick Khan and Paul Levesque discussed the return of WWE live events this summer, explaining to the employees that they've discovered house shows are important for young talents to get reps in the ring and to experiment and try things in front of

Rousey-Carano payouts https://mmapayout.com/2026/05/19/rousey-carano-payouts/

Another blown save by Munoz #goms

Rousey-Carano produce huge viewership numbers https://mmapayout.com/2026/05/19/rousey-carano-produce-huge-viewership-numbers/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports