• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Zuffa retains Boies Schiller & Flexner

December 30, 2014 by Jason Cruz 2 Comments

The UFC issued a statement in which it announced that it has retained the law firm of Boies, Schiller & Flexner to defend it against plaintiffs seeking class action status alleging Zuffa of violating antitrust laws.

Per the UFC web site:

We have built a popular business from modest beginnings by meeting the needs of fans and fighters. Millions of people have watched our bouts, we have instituted leading health and safety measures for our athletes, and fighters are free to negotiate contract terms.

We will stand up against the plaintiffs in this litigation every step of the way, and have engaged attorneys from Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP with a depth of experience in antitrust issues.

Bill Isaacson, our lead litigator, says, “The antitrust laws have long favored companies that create new products and services that consumers want. That is exactly what the UFC has done here through its long and substantial investment in building a popular sport.”

We are proud of the company we have built, confident in our legal position, and intend to prevail in this lawsuit.

Payout Perspective:

Boies, Schiller & Flexner is a high profile firm as some may recognize the last name Boies as David Boies from Bush v. Gore (Boies represented Gore) fame.  Lead counsel appears to be Bill Isaacson, a partner with the firm.  According to his bio, he provided key cross-examination (according to me the hardest thing to do in litigation) of NCAA witnesses in the 2014 case of O’Bannon v. NCAA.  Isaacson, who was one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs, prevailed on behalf of O’Bannon.  With the retention of its attorneys, it will be an interesting and hotly contested matter.  Stay tuned in 2015.

Filed Under: Antitrust Class Action, Featured, legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. jjjjjj_ffffff says

    December 31, 2014 at 10:02 am

    if the UFC fights were as hotly contested as the lawsuits, Zuffa ratings and PPV numbers would be through the roof

    Reply
  2. tops E says

    December 31, 2014 at 1:00 pm

    Hahahaha…the ” humble” PR by the ufc….would be effective if dw was not a dictator all these years and aggressive in bashing fighters now it really looks pathetic….dw is afraid hahahaha…..from modest beginnings?maybe seg times….but zuffa spending huge sums at the start is not modest at all hahahahahahahahaha pathetic

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court

Plaintiffs highlight outstanding discovery in Johnson antitrust case

UFC 329 Payout Perspective

Does Conor McGregor still have the aura?

Court Memo and Order from CSI Entertainment-Mayweather TRO hearing

TKO responds to allegations of missing discovery in Johnson case

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Glorified mascot 😂😂😂
Who is bruh
Who gave him a voice
You play 3 years gang
3 different teams

Ain’t coming at you but stop trying me bruh
@EmmanuelAcho

What

Jon Rothstein @NotJ0NRoth

Breaking: ESPN parting ways with long time college basketball personality Jay Bilas.

ICYMI

MMA Payout @MMAPayout

CSI Entertainment attorneys claim that Stephen Espinoza's declaration in support of Floyd #Mayweather is a #quidproquo as the boxer is suing Espinoza and #Showtime #Boxing

WA judge halts Kalshi 'prediction market' via @seattletimes

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The us number for the McGregor show was 6.1. Milllion. White House show was 7 million. Rousey fight was just over 9. But Netflix has a big advantage in homes.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports