• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Zuffa retains Boies Schiller & Flexner

December 30, 2014 by Jason Cruz 2 Comments

The UFC issued a statement in which it announced that it has retained the law firm of Boies, Schiller & Flexner to defend it against plaintiffs seeking class action status alleging Zuffa of violating antitrust laws.

Per the UFC web site:

We have built a popular business from modest beginnings by meeting the needs of fans and fighters. Millions of people have watched our bouts, we have instituted leading health and safety measures for our athletes, and fighters are free to negotiate contract terms.

We will stand up against the plaintiffs in this litigation every step of the way, and have engaged attorneys from Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP with a depth of experience in antitrust issues.

Bill Isaacson, our lead litigator, says, “The antitrust laws have long favored companies that create new products and services that consumers want. That is exactly what the UFC has done here through its long and substantial investment in building a popular sport.”

We are proud of the company we have built, confident in our legal position, and intend to prevail in this lawsuit.

Payout Perspective:

Boies, Schiller & Flexner is a high profile firm as some may recognize the last name Boies as David Boies from Bush v. Gore (Boies represented Gore) fame.  Lead counsel appears to be Bill Isaacson, a partner with the firm.  According to his bio, he provided key cross-examination (according to me the hardest thing to do in litigation) of NCAA witnesses in the 2014 case of O’Bannon v. NCAA.  Isaacson, who was one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs, prevailed on behalf of O’Bannon.  With the retention of its attorneys, it will be an interesting and hotly contested matter.  Stay tuned in 2015.

Filed Under: Antitrust Class Action, Featured, legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. jjjjjj_ffffff says

    December 31, 2014 at 10:02 am

    if the UFC fights were as hotly contested as the lawsuits, Zuffa ratings and PPV numbers would be through the roof

    Reply
  2. tops E says

    December 31, 2014 at 1:00 pm

    Hahahaha…the ” humble” PR by the ufc….would be effective if dw was not a dictator all these years and aggressive in bashing fighters now it really looks pathetic….dw is afraid hahahaha…..from modest beginnings?maybe seg times….but zuffa spending huge sums at the start is not modest at all hahahahahahahahaha pathetic

    Reply

Leave a Reply to tops E Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Wrestlemania 41 is the highest-grossing event in company history

UFC 314 Payout Perspective

As exclusive negotiating window closes, ESPN bullish on UFC return

UFC makes Meta sponsor deal official

Sports Lawyers Association Broadcast discussing Saudi Arabia involvement in boxing

Ryan Garcia/Golden Boy sued by Fanmio

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

-30-

Twitter 1863292243685372191
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

John Pollock and Brandon Thurston discuss the fallout for Conor McGregor after the conclusion of the civil case

We welcome lawyer Jason Cruz from @MMAPayout to discuss the decision, the fallout for McGregor’s business endeavors, and the UFC’s lack of response.

Twitter 1861864199543992422

Leaving soon

Twitter 1861583105230020701

Coby Bryant

Twitter 1860826101653840296
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Ticket sales information for Keyshawn Davis vs. Gustavo Lemos:
Tickets printed: 9,815
Face value of capacity: $1,069,100
Unsold tickets: 0
Tickets given away: 29
Tickets sold: 9,786
Proceeds from sold tickets: $1,067,450
Adjusted gate for taxes: $1,036,930
Do not believe! Verify.

Twitter 1860124654687728080
Load More

Copyright © 2025 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports