• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Virtustream CEO explains why they sponsor UFC fighters

November 13, 2013 by MMAPayout Moderator 14 Comments

Virtustream, a company which offers enterprise cloud computing services, is not the type of company you first think of when discussing UFC sponsors. UFC’s fan demographic is largely composed of the adult males between the ages of 18-34. Is there some correlation between the demographic and enterprise cloud computing services? Not necessarily.

So why would Chairman/CEO of Virtustream Rodney Rogers, who is self admittedly a big MMA fan, go out of his way to sponsor UFC fighters? He explains it on a Virtustream blog post, which he titled “We Love the Boom”.

“So it’s probably not a huge surprise that we sponsor MMA fighters from time to time, mostly in Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) events. We are a young venture-backed technology firm and spend a very modest amount of money on marketing each year (~2% of revenue), so we are careful where we place our precious dollars and utilize avenues like social media and various forms of on-line interaction extensively. I think we do pretty well in terms of return on investment in this regard. Sponsoring an MMA fighter on prime time PPV or national TV (FOX) is not as expensive as you may think, if you follow the right process and know the right people. The primary reason we do this is to reach the 18 – 34 age demographic (loyal UFC viewers) for brand awareness, as this is the group our software engineers primarily come from. It has indeed helped us in a highly competitive market.”

Using the M18-34 demographic as a way to recruit employers is definitely an interesting tactic, and gives a whole different meaning to ROI (return on investment). But Rogers also stressed another benefit of sponsoring MMA fighters, their character.

“I have also found many of the athletes in this sport to be uncommonly good people. They conduct themselves with honor and generally all give back to their community. They are pretty amazing people, really. These characteristics are the ones that we hope to embody as a firm.”

 

Payout Perspective:

This is quite the different perspective we have come to know from many other sponsors.  Aside from their most recent sponsorship endeavor with the UFC for the Fight for the Troops event which took place last week, Virtustream has also been involved in other events.  They sponsored Frankie Edgar at UFC 156 and also Joe Lauzon at UFC 155.

One of the most interesting quotes from Rogers was his mention of UFC sponsorship cost – “Sponsoring an MMA fighter on prime time PPV or national TV (FOX) is not as expensive as you may think, if you follow the right process and know the right people.” That comment can be interpreted in several different ways, but it gives us one of the many different perspectives between sponsors and the UFC.

Filed Under: sponsorships, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Machiel Van says

    November 13, 2013 at 10:07 am

    I’ve been curious about this. There do seem to be a lot of sponsors that end up in the Octagon in some form that seem very unlikely as far as Zuffa’s sponsorship fee is concerned.

    Reply
  2. BrainSmasher says

    November 13, 2013 at 12:36 pm

    Well it seems the UFC implemented the sponsor fee to raise sponsor pay for the fighter and the UFC. If they let Pepsi in the UFC it really hurts their chance to bring in Coke. So if you bring in Pepsi or allow them to sponsor fighters. You really have to make sure they don’t get in cheap. You have to make sure you cover the potential loss of Coke to make it worth allowing Pepsi. But with this company. It is t your typical sponsor. There isnt other companies like it to really go after to get more money from. Basically this is free sponsorship money with no negative side effect. This and the limited value for the company to gain from sponsorships of fights could explain why they are given a deal to get around the sponsor tax.

    Reply
  3. czrdgr8 says

    November 13, 2013 at 3:54 pm

    “Expensive” is relative term

    Reply
  4. BrainSmasher says

    November 13, 2013 at 6:35 pm

    Not when you are talking about number of eyes on the product or ROI. I doubt he would say that if he didn’t already know other advertising avenues with equal results, were not more expensive. HE has to be comparing it to something.

    Reply
  5. BrainSmasher says

    November 13, 2013 at 6:39 pm

    Also the UFC has always been a much cheaper way to reach viewers. For the number of people the UFC reaches they are cheap compared to any other sport. See what $30,000-$50,000 gets you in NASCAR.

    Reply
  6. Tops of says

    November 13, 2013 at 7:18 pm

    Well Gatorade did not pay money for Jon jones for sponsorship so it’s a good business move hahahahaha

    Reply
  7. Tops of says

    November 13, 2013 at 7:33 pm

    http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/boxing/four-gold-medalists-simply-dropped-bob-arum-lap-212504176–box.html

    Good article…global

    Reply
  8. BrainSmasher says

    November 13, 2013 at 8:46 pm

    Didn’t Gatorade come out and said those reports are false? That’s what happens when 1 stupid ass listens to another stupid ass who is making up rumors.

    Reply
  9. BrainSmasher says

    November 13, 2013 at 8:52 pm

    Again I will clown Tops just as I have Sampson Simpson. Here is Rovell eating his words after he come out and made up a bunch of rumors and Gatorade told him he is full of shit.

    ”
    darren rovell ✔ @darrenrovell
    Follow
    Jon Jones’ 1-fight deal with Gatorade does involve some compensation. He is not wearing their logo for free.

    “

    Reply
  10. Tops of says

    November 14, 2013 at 2:16 am

    Some? Cases of Gatorade? Hahaha

    Reply
  11. Chang says

    November 14, 2013 at 6:13 am

    New Boxing Reality Show
    http://www.boxingscene.com/new-boxing-reality-show-looms-more-details-surface–71640

    Reply
  12. BrainSmasher says

    November 14, 2013 at 5:20 pm

    Like they didn’t screw the pooch when they had The Contender. Biggest piece of crap ever put on tv. But that’s what happens when there is no structure in boxing and the individuals just jump at every dollar put in front of them. No one made the right choice. Just went after the money. So when boxing got a black eye because of the show. No one cared.

    Edited fights with fake audience and sound effects added to punches. It was the biggest insult to someone’s intelligence ever!

    Now boxing thinks it can do it since they can piggy back off the UFC and use their formula. Goes to show the UFC is the best thing to ever happen to boxing. Boxing has tried to change its ways and the popularity of the UFC has put more interest in boxing from tv execs.

    Reply
  13. Machiel Van says

    November 14, 2013 at 7:20 pm

    Reality TV is on the decline, and TUF and Fightmaster are good indications that it may no longer be a viable promotional vehicle for combat sports in terms of drawing new viewers to combat sports. However, I think it could still be a useful tool to promote certain fighters if used correctly (TUF 18 is drawing a lot of interest in Miesha Tate, and despite the perceived negative attention it’s given Rousey, they’ve got fans talking about her and the upcoming fight). It will be interesting to see what angle they try and take with the new show, but is reality TV conducive to drawing interest from boxing’s core audience? I have my doubts.

    Reply
  14. Tops of says

    November 14, 2013 at 8:20 pm

    Top Rank Signs 2012 Olympic Silver Medalist Falcäohttp://philboxing.com/news/story-89047.html

    For the brazil market

    Reply

Leave a Reply to BrainSmasher Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Y’all know who would never reject Randy a handshake ?? PRINCESSSSS

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

He supports Black women on the poles but not AT the polls. SMH.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

"The President of the United States is making it impossible for me to stick to sports because he keeps showing up at all of them."

Bomani reacts to Trump continuing to bring politics into sports

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Cal Raleigh declines handshake with Seattle teammate, Randy Arozarena

#WorldBaseballClassic

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

They gassing this Paul Skenes Air Force academy storyline like he’s a war hero. All he did was go to a couple classes 😭😭😭

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports