• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Looking back at the PPV history of UFC 158 main event fighters.

March 15, 2013 by Jason Cruz 3 Comments

MMA Payout takes a look back at the prior PPV history of UFC 158’s main event fighters.  The quick conclusion is that the success of the PPV boils down to GSP.

GSP

UFC 87     625,000 (vs. Jon Fitch)
UFC 94     920,000 (vs. BJ Penn II)
UFC 100  1.6M        (vs. Thiago Alves)
UFC 111  770,000  (vs. Dan Hardy)
UFC 124  785,000  (vs. Josh Koscheck)
UFC 129  800,000  (vs. Jake Shields)
UFC 154  700,000  (vs. Carlos Condit)

The bell cow when it comes to UFC PPVs.  With Brock Lesnar in the WWE, Georges St. Pierre is the King of UFC PPVs.  I decided to start the list from his first title defense after winning the belt from Matt Serra at UFC 83.  Notably, UFC 87 also marked the first UFC win for Brock Lesnar.  GSP and Lesnar also appeared on the same card at UFC 100.

GSP’s average PPV buy rate since he’s had the welterweight title: ~886K.  Of course, this includes UFC 100 and 129 but that should tell you that when the UFC has a major event, Georges St. Pierre will be on the card.

Nick Diaz

UFC 143  400,000 (Carlos Condit)
UFC 137  280,000 (vs. BJ Penn)

Only two entries for Diaz since he entered the UFC from Strikeforce.  You recall UFC 137 was the event he was supposed to fight GSP and then was taken off the card only to be put back on after an injury to GSP caused a major reshuffle.  Diaz is a polarizing figure and if he ever decides to “play the game” he has an appealing style that the casual fan could appreciate.

Johny Hendricks

UFC 133 310,000 (vs. Mike Pierce)
UFC 141 535,000 (vs. Jon Fitch)
UFC 154 700,000 (vs. Martin Kampman)

Carlos Condit

UFC 132  320,000 (vs. Kim Dong-Hyun)
UFC 143  400,000 (vs. Diaz)
UFC 154  700,000 (vs. GSP)

Not much to say about Hendricks-Condit at this point.  Both were on UFC 154 and Hendricks was on a Brock Lesnar card (141) hence the good buy rate. The winner of this match-up may have to wait until 2014 to get a shot at GSP assuming he wins and goes on to fight Anderson Silva later this year.

Payout Perspective:

GSP should have this PPV around 700K buys.  A ticked off GSP (or rattled depending on how you view it) against Nick Diaz could have it pushing higher.  Diaz speaking at the teleconference and presser could only help the hype for people to buy this event.

Filed Under: pay-per-view, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Sampson Simpson says

    March 16, 2013 at 5:16 am

    I wont lie, Im into this fight

    Reply
  2. codemaster says

    March 16, 2013 at 11:13 am

    This is a big fight because fans have been wanting to see it for a while now.

    Diaz lost by a very slim margin against Condit–and many fans thought Diaz won the fight. Condit went on to a title shot from that fight. If Diaz had won, he would have gotten the title shot.

    In my mind, Diaz and Hendricks are about equal in their top contender status.

    Hendricks was very impressive with his KO’s of Fitch and Kampman, but he also lost to Rick Story not so long ago–and he had split decisions against Pierce and Koscheck.

    And Hendricks is assured of a title shot now if he wins.

    It was smart of GSP to pick Diaz while his Best Before Date was still valid. While Diaz does not pull big PPV’s by himself–paired with GSP it should bump up the PPV take.

    We will see when the numbers come out. Any numbers over 700-750 thousand PPVs will be due to GSP’s choice of opponents. People like GSP, as the PPV numbers testify–but fans want to see interesting opponents which challenge the champ. Ironically, GSP’s mistake of getting caught by a shin to the head in his last fight with Condit actually made the fight more exciting to fans.

    GSP’s main problem in the last few years has been his dominance. Close fights are exciting fights.

    Reply
  3. natasftw says

    March 17, 2013 at 10:27 am

    codemaster, Hendricks is by far more scary than Diaz. To beat Diaz fighters just need to avoid fighting Diaz’s fight. If GSP was looking for the best possible opponent in order to increase PPV buys based entirely on the matchup, he’d have been smart to want Hendricks.

    Anyone that watched the Condit fight knew Diaz lost. His post-fight whining was as damning as much as it was intelligent. He cried that he didn’t look hurt so how could he have lost the fight. Condit also wasn’t hurt, so clearly he couldn’t have lost by Diaz’s own ramblings. Diaz offered nothing in the fight, and the scorecards ALL showed it.

    GSPs main problem has been the fans whining about finishes. He opted not to Mir Hardy with the hold in tight. Hardy should have tapped, he was finished. How the Fitch fight wasn’t stopped is more of a mystery than how Lesnar was allowed to continue against Carwin. He had the choice to do serious, suggesting the shattered orbital wasn’t serious, damage to Josh and opted to make the fight be less permanent on Josh’s body.

    His problem isn’t as much dominance as it is boxing fans wanting to morph MMA into their sport. When boxing fans understand there’s more to MMA than highlight reel knockouts, “fans” will be less pouty about dominant performances.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Opetaia fires back at IBF in opposition to MTD

UFC 331 Payout Perspective

UFC 331 attendance, gate and bonuses

Scott Coker is back with Ki MMA

TKO owns this weekend

Appeals Court sets date for oral argument in Zuffa appeal

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

For the few that are following the William Keane lawsuit against #TopRank #Boxing the Court finally issued an order denying the Motion to Dismiss @DanRafael1 @EzRawBoxing @Boxing_Tribune

Debate between colleagues fail to show any difference via @nwasianweekly

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Do Guardian Caps actually prevent concussions? @ChrisNowinski1 tells @PabloTorre why the story "appears to be a bit of a scam":

"[The NFL's] own published study showed it wasn't true."

"They love that the public sees the Guardian Caps because it's basically virtue-signaling."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

#UFC332 attendance and gate were a serious drop from previous #UFC numbered events at the Delta Center https://mmapayout.com/2026/10/04/ufc-332-attendance/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

A truly mortifying decision.

Beyond disrespectful to generations of Murrow college alumnus. A reprehensible decision motivated purely by greed and a disregard for the integrity of journalism. Damaging the credibility of degrees earned by hard-working and passionate students.

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports