• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Plaintiffs claim “revolt” caused Dominance to disobey court order

February 11, 2026 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

The Plaintiffs in the Kajan Johnson lawsuit filed an Order to Show Cause compelling Dominance MMA to provide reason why it has yet to comply with an August 2025 order in which it had to turn over information which includes texts from the phones of employees including Ali Abdelaziz. 

Dominance MMA was served a third-party subpoena but did not comply. A court-order was issued and according to the court filing the attorneys for the plaintiffs and defendants attempted to coordinate the discovery including the scope of the information to be produced, a vendor to produce them and other administrative issues surround the discovery. However, according to the filing, there was a “revolt”” at Dominance and Abdelaziz refused “to provide responsive documents and communications, citing confidentiality concerns, unspecified social media posts “disparaging” Dominance, and general mistrust of patients.”

Payout Perspective:

It’s called a “Show Cause” hearing because the Plaintiffs are asking Dominance to show why they have disobeyed the court order allowing discovery. Reading between the lines of the brief it sounds like that the attorneys for Dominance believed that an agreement was in place and then attempted to stall based on the length in time between correspondence between the parties. It sounds like that Abdelaziz realized the information that they would have to submit to the Plaintiffs and it could be damaging for a variety of reasons. Perhaps, legal, perhaps reputation. But whatever it might be backing out of an agreement, let alone court order, at the last second is a bad look. At some point he will have to produce documents. We will see how this plays out and if a deal can be done before the hearing.

Filed Under: legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Ortiz files motion to confirm injunction over

Congressional Report on Ali Revival Act released

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Let this be a message to fucking sellouts and those of you who sell morality for social currency. When it’s finally time to show whether you actually have “IT” within you you’ll be exposed

Please god not this guy again

WWE @WWE

.@JellyRoll615 just clocked @mikethemiz 👊

They charging a tax?

Wrestling News @WrestlingNewsCo

Las Vegas Watch Parties Back On For WWE WrestleMania 42, Blackout Has Been Lifted https://wrestlingnews.co/wwe-news/las-vegas-watch-parties-back-wwe-wrestlemania-blackout-been-lifted/

Maybe one of these matches will be fight to the death and the body will be fed to lions

Dr. Lavie Margolin @Laviemarg

A sanctioned UFC match requires a permit, unless it's at the White House - https://goo.gl/alerts/tc3QYe

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Cal Raleigh did not have a single passed ball all last season for the Mariners, and now this one in the 7th inning.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports