• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Plaintiffs claim “revolt” caused Dominance to disobey court order

February 11, 2026 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

The Plaintiffs in the Kajan Johnson lawsuit filed an Order to Show Cause compelling Dominance MMA to provide reason why it has yet to comply with an August 2025 order in which it had to turn over information which includes texts from the phones of employees including Ali Abdelaziz. 

Dominance MMA was served a third-party subpoena but did not comply. A court-order was issued and according to the court filing the attorneys for the plaintiffs and defendants attempted to coordinate the discovery including the scope of the information to be produced, a vendor to produce them and other administrative issues surround the discovery. However, according to the filing, there was a “revolt”” at Dominance and Abdelaziz refused “to provide responsive documents and communications, citing confidentiality concerns, unspecified social media posts “disparaging” Dominance, and general mistrust of patients.”

Payout Perspective:

It’s called a “Show Cause” hearing because the Plaintiffs are asking Dominance to show why they have disobeyed the court order allowing discovery. Reading between the lines of the brief it sounds like that the attorneys for Dominance believed that an agreement was in place and then attempted to stall based on the length in time between correspondence between the parties. It sounds like that Abdelaziz realized the information that they would have to submit to the Plaintiffs and it could be damaging for a variety of reasons. Perhaps, legal, perhaps reputation. But whatever it might be backing out of an agreement, let alone court order, at the last second is a bad look. At some point he will have to produce documents. We will see how this plays out and if a deal can be done before the hearing.

Filed Under: legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Plaintiffs seeking $270K from Dominance MMA

UFC Seattle attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

UFC fighter Tim Means arrested on child abuse charge via @MMAJunkie

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

De'Zhaun Stribling, the San Francisco 49ers’ second-round pick, has greatness in the family 😤

His uncle, Don "The Rock" Muraco is a WWE Hall of Fame legend.

They got rid of the Wyatt 6

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The US trademark office shows the Lucha Underground trademark (and a bunch associated with it) were transferred from the old Lucha Libre FMV company to a new holding company three years ago. There's been no recent activity.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports