• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Plaintiffs claim “revolt” caused Dominance to disobey court order

February 11, 2026 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

The Plaintiffs in the Kajan Johnson lawsuit filed an Order to Show Cause compelling Dominance MMA to provide reason why it has yet to comply with an August 2025 order in which it had to turn over information which includes texts from the phones of employees including Ali Abdelaziz. 

Dominance MMA was served a third-party subpoena but did not comply. A court-order was issued and according to the court filing the attorneys for the plaintiffs and defendants attempted to coordinate the discovery including the scope of the information to be produced, a vendor to produce them and other administrative issues surround the discovery. However, according to the filing, there was a “revolt”” at Dominance and Abdelaziz refused “to provide responsive documents and communications, citing confidentiality concerns, unspecified social media posts “disparaging” Dominance, and general mistrust of patients.”

Payout Perspective:

It’s called a “Show Cause” hearing because the Plaintiffs are asking Dominance to show why they have disobeyed the court order allowing discovery. Reading between the lines of the brief it sounds like that the attorneys for Dominance believed that an agreement was in place and then attempted to stall based on the length in time between correspondence between the parties. It sounds like that Abdelaziz realized the information that they would have to submit to the Plaintiffs and it could be damaging for a variety of reasons. Perhaps, legal, perhaps reputation. But whatever it might be backing out of an agreement, let alone court order, at the last second is a bad look. At some point he will have to produce documents. We will see how this plays out and if a deal can be done before the hearing.

Filed Under: legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

TKO responds to allegations of missing discovery in Johnson case

Judge denies CSI Entertainment’s Temporary Restraining Order

Mayweather-CSI Entertainment legal drama heats up

Mayweather legal saga continues as CSI Entertainment continues to pursue injunction

Mayweather boxing exhibition in Greece cancelled

Mayweather responds to CSI Entertainment Injunction request

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Maybe face of litigation

Ring Magazine @ringmagazine

Floyd Mayweather on his star power ahead of his comeback 👀

Do you agree with him? 🤔

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Some dude who’s never left Burlington says Seattle sucks. But every single one of these soccer guys who have traveled all over the world and seen city after city say Seattle is amazing. I don’t know who to believe anymore.

JP again with an errant throw #goms

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

🏆 Mundial 2026
📝 16 avos de final 
🗓️ 03 de Julho
🏟️ Estádio de Miami

FIM DO JOGO 
Argentina 🇦🇷 3️⃣-2️⃣ 🇨🇻 Cabo Verde  

Termina assim a nossa participação no Mundial 

http://www.fcf.cv

#FIFAWorldCup | #FIFAWorldCup2026 | #CaboVerde | #TubarõesAzuis | #WeAreCaboVerde

#TKO responds to allegations of missing discovery in Johnson case #UFC #sportslaw https://mmapayout.com/2026/07/03/tko-responds-to-allegations-of-missing-discovery-in-johnson-case/

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports