• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Ortiz files motion to confirm injunction over

March 12, 2026 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Despite a court order which moved his case to arbitration, Vergil Ortiz seeks to confirm that the Golden Boy injunction is over. The move is an attempt to sign the Ortiz-Jaron Ennis fight despite the Golden Boy arbitration.

A hearing was held on February 20, 2026, regarding Golden Boy’s request for a TRO and preliminary injunction. The Court noted that the Temporary Injunction would dissolve on February 27, 2026.

According to Ortiz’s lawyer declaration, Eddie Hearn, Ennis’ promoter, was still interested in a fight between the two. Hearn cautioned that if the fight could not be done, there were other fighters he was looking at for Ennis.

The purpose of the motion is “made on the grounds that although the TRO is written to be open-ended, Rule 65 provides that the TRO expired, by operation of law, fourteen days after issuance. However Ortiz brings this Motion to ensure that any action he may take does not violate the TRO, or other order of this Court.”

Payout Perspective:

The reason for the motion is to ensure that Golden Boy does not try to block Ortiz’s attempts to sign a fight between Ortiz and Ennis. Of course, Golden Boy will respond to oppose this motion which seems overkill but Ortiz’s lawyers want clarification on the issue. It would seem to me that an arbitrator would have to decide the issue of the breach of the contract and despite the lifting of the TRO, Ortiz probably would be prevented from signing a deal with Matchroom Boxing to fight Ennis but we shall see.

Filed Under: boxing, Boxing Lawsuits, Featured, Golden Boy, legal, Ortiz v Golden Boy

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC 330 Payout Perspective

Update on CSI Entertainment – Mayweather lawsuit, Injunction request withdrawn

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit file statement prior to status conference

Despite two big losses, TKO touts another solid quarter

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚

Dan Canobbio @DanCanobbio

The Money Team Law Firm

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

#Zuffa filed its Reply Brief in its appeal to the 9th Circuit in the Cirkunov antitrust lawsuit. Appeal is based on district court's decision to determine whether defendants held monopoly/monopsony power and whether the contract clauses were unsconsionable #UFC

2

The mysterious $11M man or woman #UFC https://mmapayout.com/2026/08/26/the-mysterious-11m-man-or-woman/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Thank you Seattle for the privilege. How often can anyone buy a Super Bowl winning team? Humbled.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 ยท MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports