• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Oscar De La Hoya pens op-ed opposing TKO-backed Ali Act legislation

November 18, 2025 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Former boxer and current promoter Oscar De La Hoya wrote an opinion editorial in the Las Vegas Review-Journal opposing the Muhammad Ali Boxing Revival Act which is being backed by TKO and specifically Zuffa Boxing.

De La Hoya had targeted Dana White about the attempts to amend the Ali Act and the alleged “fight-fixing” issue in a social media post. This op-ed did not lodge any personal attack but made pointed arguments on how the proposed legislation would hurt fighters.

The Ali Act of 2000 was one of the few federal laws ever passed to protect athletes rather than corporations. It barred promoters from acting as managers, required disclosure of finances and empowered state commissions to act as independent referees for fairness and safety. The new legislation would gut that framework. Fighters would lose bargaining freedom, independent sanctioning bodies would be marginalized and the open marketplace that keeps the sport honest would collapse into monopoly.

De La Hoya refers to the Universal Boxing Organization (UBO) which Zuffa Boxing would like to create. The UBO would create an alternative to the current landscape in boxing. In it, the UBO would be able to act as promoter and matchmaker. What many fighters who oppose the act argue is that this would lead to coercive contracts and eliminate any bargaining leverage that a fighter may have. Most fighters point to the UFC antitrust lawsuits as examples of what happens under a UBO-like scheme as the UFC business practices.

De La Hoya also argues that the proposed legislation is contrary to what Muhammad Ali stood for.

“Muhammad Ali fought for autonomy, dignity and the right to control his own career. To attach his name to a bill that would concentrate power in corporate hands is a moral inversion of everything he stood for.”

Payout Perspective:

The article also calls for the UFC to be investigated by the State of Nevada based on the questions of fight fixing. He also called for there to be hearings on the Ali Act prior to a vote on the bill. It is interesting that this was put out in the Las Vegas Review Journal which also reports on the UFC. White takes these things personal and you can predict a response by White or someone with TKO to respond to De La Hoya’s opinion piece. Despite the fact that the California State Athletic Commission has pledged it support to the new law, it does not mean that it will pass.

Filed Under: Ali Act, boxing, Featured, legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Johnson plaintiffs take a renewed aim at Dominance in antitrust lawsuit

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Conor McGregor returns July 11th

Keane’s attorneys fire back at Top Rank based on undiscovered evidence

White writes letter to Trump requesting change to law

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Not sure why you beat Femi here unless you get a third match at #Summerslam #WWE

Brock Lesnar face is supe red #WWE

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Over three days Thurston and Pollock broke the judge sanctions story against defendants in the WWE suit, Thurston won his motion, also beat The Athletic by half a day on Trump's TKO stocks.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

OKC Thunder fans yelling flopper is like OKC voters complaining about Epstein files while voting for Trump

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Dylan Harper: “It’s a blessing to represent the Philippines, where I’m from. I think me and Jordan Clarkson are doing a great job doing that.”

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports