• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Oscar De La Hoya pens op-ed opposing TKO-backed Ali Act legislation

November 18, 2025 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Former boxer and current promoter Oscar De La Hoya wrote an opinion editorial in the Las Vegas Review-Journal opposing the Muhammad Ali Boxing Revival Act which is being backed by TKO and specifically Zuffa Boxing.

De La Hoya had targeted Dana White about the attempts to amend the Ali Act and the alleged “fight-fixing” issue in a social media post. This op-ed did not lodge any personal attack but made pointed arguments on how the proposed legislation would hurt fighters.

The Ali Act of 2000 was one of the few federal laws ever passed to protect athletes rather than corporations. It barred promoters from acting as managers, required disclosure of finances and empowered state commissions to act as independent referees for fairness and safety. The new legislation would gut that framework. Fighters would lose bargaining freedom, independent sanctioning bodies would be marginalized and the open marketplace that keeps the sport honest would collapse into monopoly.

De La Hoya refers to the Universal Boxing Organization (UBO) which Zuffa Boxing would like to create. The UBO would create an alternative to the current landscape in boxing. In it, the UBO would be able to act as promoter and matchmaker. What many fighters who oppose the act argue is that this would lead to coercive contracts and eliminate any bargaining leverage that a fighter may have. Most fighters point to the UFC antitrust lawsuits as examples of what happens under a UBO-like scheme as the UFC business practices.

De La Hoya also argues that the proposed legislation is contrary to what Muhammad Ali stood for.

“Muhammad Ali fought for autonomy, dignity and the right to control his own career. To attach his name to a bill that would concentrate power in corporate hands is a moral inversion of everything he stood for.”

Payout Perspective:

The article also calls for the UFC to be investigated by the State of Nevada based on the questions of fight fixing. He also called for there to be hearings on the Ali Act prior to a vote on the bill. It is interesting that this was put out in the Las Vegas Review Journal which also reports on the UFC. White takes these things personal and you can predict a response by White or someone with TKO to respond to De La Hoya’s opinion piece. Despite the fact that the California State Athletic Commission has pledged it support to the new law, it does not mean that it will pass.

Filed Under: Ali Act, boxing, Featured, legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC 331 Payout Perspective

UFC 331 attendance, gate and bonuses

Scott Coker is back with Ki MMA

TKO owns this weekend

Appeals Court sets date for oral argument in Zuffa appeal

Don King sends Zuffa Boxing cease and desist

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

#UFC Fight Night 284 bonuses https://mmapayout.com/2026/09/27/ufc-fight-night-284-bonuses/

Regular season Jason Myers is money #Seahawks

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ Not here to waste anyone's time

I mean it actually matters because we are being told the fight may be held up

Wally Downes Jr @WallyDownes_Jr

Warren rebuild Fury

Hearn is AJ's career-long promoter

Nick Khan did the Netflix deal

Dana White booked New York's Madison Square Garden

Can anyone, anywhere, tell me what this UFC fella has to do with the fight - apart from being Turki's latest pet?

Top work @TakeAymz

Kodi Greene has to be a huge disappointment #purplereign

Load More

Copyright © 2026 ยท MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports