• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

TKO looking to amend Ali Act

April 15, 2025 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

ESPN reports that the TKO Group is soliciting support to amend the Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act. The federal law was put into place in 2000 to protect the health and safety of boxers.

The news of the Ali Act amendment comes several weeks after TKO announced that it would start a new boxing promotion with the help of Turkui Al-Sheikh, the head of Riyadh Season and the General Entertainment Authority of Saudi Arabia.

The news should not be of much surprise as the UFC actively lobbies for its purpose in D.C. and this past February during an interview with Pat MacAfee, Ari Emanuel made a subtle not that he did not like the Ali Act.

While news of the Ali Act amendment(s) has spread, only speculation of what the changes would be are occurring. But, based on the presumption that Dana White is involved, its likely to favor the promoter-side of the issue.

Payout Perspective:

The UFC actively lobbied against the Ali Act Amendment to include MMA fighters years ago. Ironically, the guy who drew up the Amendment is now a staunch opponent of it as we all knew that the Ali Act Amendment was just a PR stunt. Certainly, this time around any amendment to the Ali Act would favor TKO. One would speculate that one of the things it would go after would be the “firewall” between manager and promoter.

From our “friend” AI: A “firewall” between a manager and a promoter in the sports world…refers to a legal separation or restriction that prevents conflicts of interest. This means, a promoter, who is responsible for organizing fights and promoting the sport, cannot simultaneously act as a manger, who represents and negotiates for a fighter’s career. The goal is to ensure fairness and prevent the potential favoritism or bias that could arise if a promoter was also managing fighters they were promoting.

Eliminating this from the Ali Act would “streamline” the process of making fights. It also would suppress wages of the fighters if a manager also promotes the fighter and vice versa. It is one of the important issues of the Ali Act. In addition, ranking of fighters would be another issue that I could see TKO trying to eliminate. Not dealing with “mandatory” title fights or “step-aside” money would be something that TKO would benefit from while the fighters would not.

MPO will continue to follow.

Filed Under: Ali Act, boxing, Boxing vs. MMA, TKO, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Johnson plaintiffs take a renewed aim at Dominance in antitrust lawsuit

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Conor McGregor returns July 11th

Keane’s attorneys fire back at Top Rank based on undiscovered evidence

White writes letter to Trump requesting change to law

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Rams trading for Myles Garrett just to watch the Seahawks hoist the Lombardi in SoFi is gonna make for some insane crashouts in LA ๐Ÿคฃ

A shot to the nuts is always funny...except the dude that got hit.

Baseball Quotes @BaseballQuotes1

Dude fouled a pitch off his nuts and the camera cuts to the first baseman losing it ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

DO WE GOT A POLYMARKET ON IF IRAN WILL BOMB SOMETHING DURING UFC WHITE HOUSE?

FIFA World Cup brings anticipation, criticism via @nwasianweekly

Some of the comments... :-)

MMA Payout @MMAPayout

Dana White Goes Card Shopping | Spends Over $36,000 On Rare Tom Brady, M... https://youtu.be/0Jgx9ubjnCA?si=Z3oGlNvHhk_1g1qe via @YouTube

Load More

Copyright © 2026 ยท MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports