• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Cody Rhodes sued for American Nightmare Trademark

October 21, 2024 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

A musician in California is suing Cody Rhodes for his use of the “American Nightmare” mark. The musician had entered into a settlement agreement with the WWE superstar but he claims that WWE and its vendor, Fanatics intentionally violated the contract.

The lawsuit was filed by musician Wesley Eisold in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Eisold is the lead singer of the punk rock band American Nightmare. He had filed the mark for “American Nightmare” for the band as well as for apparel. He registered the trademark in November 2016.

Rhodes (real name Runnels) filed for the “American Nightmare” trademark in the area of apparel as well in March 2019. Eisold opposed the application in August 2019. As is the process with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Rhodes had a chance to respond which he did by filing an order to cancel Eisold’s trademark.

The two sides entered into a settlement agreement in which Eisold was paid $30,000 in exchange for Rhodes not register the mark. Eisold states that the agreement also included a proviso that any apparel include Rhodes’ name and relate to wrestling. This was due to Eisold’s motif for “American Nightmare” which focused on a counter-culture look. See below example which was attached as an exhibit to the lawsuit.

However in 2022, Eisold was alerted to a new clothes from WWE and Rhodes which he asserted was a breach of their agreement due to the use of the mark. Eisold argued that the clothes were “counter-culture or punk styled and often featured a wing skulled embossed with stars and stripes, a black and white wing skull and other variations with the American flag.

Eisold argues that the depictions are similar and will lead to confusion. He has included social media posts of individuals who have confused the two marks.

Eisold states that when cease and desists were sent to the defendants there was no response.

At this point, the parties have stipulated for Runnels to have an extra 30 days from the date of filing of the lawsuit to lodge an Answer with the Court. The extra time is likely for a Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit or for the parties to negotiate another settlement. The issue that Eisold does not want to run into is to have WWE/Runnels and Fanatics attempt to cancel the trademark for Eisold as it did in the USPTO level. WWE/Runnels and Fanatics are not going to go away so we will see how this will play out and how long this may be litigated.

Filed Under: Featured, legal, UFC, WWE

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

FBI seeking no-bid contract with the UFC

Court denies Top Rank’s Motion to Dismiss in Keane case

Opetaia fires back at IBF in opposition to MTD

UFC 331 Payout Perspective

UFC 331 attendance, gate and bonuses

Scott Coker is back with Ki MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Dementia characteristic no lie

Orla Joelsen @OJoelsen

What on earth is going on here?

Why is President Trump, spitting on the floor during a rally in North Carolina?

Cubs’ Finances Could Be Unsealed in Rooftop Suit Ahead of CBA Fight via @sportico

First #NBA game of the season and Detroit goes down big only to come back within 5 in the 3rd quarter

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Adam Silver looked at the unemployment rate and said fuck it start the season at 3pm

Boston-San Antonio #NBA Finals

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports