• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

“Boots” Ennis lawsuit with promoter going to trial in May

April 30, 2021 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Jaron “Boots” Ennis will be facing a trial in federal court in Iowa against Chris Middendorf and Victory Boxing Promotions.  Middendorf alleges that he is the rightful promoter of Ennis and is suing the boxer, Ennis’ father and Cameron and Joseph Dunkin who allege they are the rightful promoters of the up-and-coming boxer.

Via Wikimedia Commons

The lawsuit and upcoming trial is another example of the sordid managerial and promotional history in combat sports. According to filings, $426,0600 of Ennis’ last six purses are being held in escrow due to the dispute. 

Plaintiffs’ viewpoint of case

Complaint – Victory Boxing … by MMA Payout

Middendorf, operating as Victory Boxing Promotions, claims that Ennis signed a promotional agreement with him on April 2016.  Plaintiff claims that the defendants knew that Victory Boxing was the promoter and worked along with Middendorf on behalf of Ennis.  In November 2018, Ennis and his manager Cameron Dunking did not communicate with Middendorf about his next fight.  Instead, they denied the relationship with Victory Boxing Promotions and signed on with an upstart company to promote Ennis.  Middendorf asserts a breach of contract against Ennis and claims that Ennis father and the Dunkins tortiously interfered with a valid contract.

Defendants Background on the Case

The 23-year-old claims that Cameron Dunkin was his manager in 2016 and then became his promoter in 2019.  Ennis claims that Middendorf acted as both manager and promoter and signed boxers to Victory Boxing Promotions.  Middendorf put Joseph Dunkin down as the promoter to circumvent the Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act rule where an individual cannot act as manager and promoter of a fighter.  Dunkin claims he had little involvement with the promotion inferring that Middendorf was doing something not legal.  Ennis claims that Middendorf knew of Cameron Dunkin’s contract arrangement when Ennis signed a promotional agreement in 2016.  There was an informal arrangement in place whereby Middendorf would work with Cameron Dunkin to sign fighters.  But there was no agreement on payment. 

Promotional Contract by MMA Payout

Payout Perspective:

This case is set to go to trial in mid-May and with a lot of the pretrial materials already filed, there is a likelihood it may happen barring a last-minute attempt to settle the situation. At least the $426K held in escrow plus other damages claimed by Middendorf are in question. But, the overarching issue is the business operations of managing/promoting a fighter. Despite the Ali Act, the case presents subtle ‘workarounds’ which are likely occurring in the sport. MPO will continue to follow.

Filed Under: boxing, Featured, legal

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Conor McGregor returns July 11th

Keane’s attorneys fire back at Top Rank based on undiscovered evidence

White writes letter to Trump requesting change to law

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

As someone who has done BJJ for over 15 years, you become a massive prick after your first couple stripes at white belt and become insufferable at blue. Most quit when they realize they can’t muscle anyone anymore.

Spencer Pratt is a black belt. Really

Seán Sheehan @SeanSheehanBA

Once again a fella takes up jiu-jitsu and becomes a massive prick.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Once again a fella takes up jiu-jitsu and becomes a massive prick.

Wow

Happy Punch @HappyPunch

Floyd Mayweather reportedly had a baby with a dancer at his Vegas strip club

He’s been ordered to pay $1M in back child support and $33k a month

(via TMZ)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

A vote is not expected during Friday’s DI Cabinet call regarding the NCAA’s proposed 5-year, age-based eligibility rule. Discussion on the topic is expected to continue with action now anticipated at their next meeting the week of June 22.

Overwhelming support remains.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports