• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Boxer files lawsuit against manager

April 16, 2021 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

A new boxing lawsuit was filed earlier this week in the Federal District Court of Nevada.  This one was filed by Robert Brant as he is suing Greg Cohen and Rapacz Boxing and Top Rank.  The thrust of the lawsuit mainly concerns Cohen and Rapacz Boxing, Brant’s former representatives.

A middleweight title holder from Texas, Brant was represented by Cohen starting in 2015 and then the agreement was amended to include Rapacz Boxing in April 2018.  Later in the year, he learned that Top Rank wanted him to be his promoter. However, according to the lawsuit, Cohen demanded that all negotiations flow through him 

Brant was on his honeymoon while negotiations with Top Rank took place. 

Cohen contacted Brant and let him know that ‘time was of the essence’ with signing with Top Rank.  Brant claims this was a misrepresentation.  Cohen and Rapacz entered into a letter agreement with Top Rank which allowed Brant’s reps to receive a portion of the money not known to Brant.

There was an alleged misrepresentation as to “step aside” money that was available for Mr. Brant. Cohen and Rapacz stated there was no “step aside” money, a sum given to fighters to allow their spot to fight the champion be taken for someone behind them in the rankings. 

Brant filed claims for violations of the Ali Act, fraud and other contractual claims stemming from the purported misrepresentations and omissions from his former coaches. Specifically, one of the claims asserted was that Cohen/Rapacz Boxing was acting as both manager and promoter for Brant which would be a violation of the federal statute. 

He also claimed a fraud upon Cohen/Rapacz.

Payout Perspective:

The lawsuit is in the infancy stages at this point but it would seem that these are clear violations of the Ali Act as well as potential fraud claims for misrepresenting to Brant the terms of the deal. Top Rank may be unknowing defendants here as Cohen likely informed them that Brant was away on his honeymoon. MPO will continue to follow.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Mayweather responds to CSI Entertainment Injunction request

Injunction filed against Mayweather from fighting this Saturday

The UFC’s undying loyalty to Trump

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit claim White’s devices “wiped” intentionally

Alex Periera accused of sexual assault, coercive sexual encounters, stalking

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Special shout out to the reporters (or those interested in the case) for having the temerity to cover both sides.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

I hate that we live in such a digital panopticon where people can just record you and post you to the worldwide web and get you fired at a whim. That being said, how are you an executive at JPMorgan and dumping trash on the ground to steal a public trash can?

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

After a 2-hour hearing on CSI's request for an injunction preventing Saturday's Mayweather-Zambidis exhibition -- which I listed to every minute of -- the judge asked for some additional questions that the lawyers need to check on. No ruling today. Lawyers need all their

Austin Reaves getting the max? Who knew?

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Ten years ago Dana and the UFC were heavily pushing pride themed shirts all through June.

3

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports