• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Luck files motion seeking verification of Alpha Entertainment responses

March 12, 2021 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

The lawsuit between Oliver Luck and Vince McMahon is going to be a knock down, drag out fight.  The latest jab has Luck filing a Motion to Compel the verified answers of Alpha Entertainment.

Alpha Entertainment, the previous owners of the XFL is part of the lawsuit.  In serving its discovery responses, Luck sought verified responses to their interrogatory responses.  A verified response states under penalty of perjury that the responses set forth are correct.  Luck argues that the responses were not verified.  “Requiring a party to sign interrogatory responses under oath serves the critical purpose of ensuring that the responding party attests to the truth of the responses,” states a case cited by Luck in his motion. 

Specifically, Luck objects to the lack of verification to three interrogatory responses.  The one glaring one pointed out by Luck is the request for Alpha to identify all employees who used Alpha or XFL-issued mobile phones for matters unrelated to XFL business from June 1, 2018 until April 13, 2020. In response, Alpha’s counsel indicated that they did not know the identity of all Alpha employees, if any…”who used an Alpha-issued mobile phone for personal matters or matters unrelated to XFL business.” 

Luck infers that the response was not made in good faith since it was an attorney, and not a representative of Alpha that responded to the question.  While attorneys do assist in responding to questions from opposing counsel, it is the responsibility of the attorney to obtain the information from the person that has knowledge of the information. 

Alpha argues that since the company was in bankruptcy, it did not have someone that could verify the responses.  Luck argues that this response is a ‘red-herring,’ noting that even in bankruptcy there is an agent of Alpha.  In the alternative, the attorney responding to the request should sign the verification.

Motion to Compel – Plaintiff by MMA Payout

Payout Perspective:

Payout Perspective:

The request highlighted here would help in determining the people that Luck’s side would track down in deposing to determine the validity of the company’s phone policy.  The requirement to verify discovery responses seems like a mere formality but it’s compulsory that every response is verified to ensure that the other side is not lying.  A lawyer will not signed a verified request since they are not the person technically responding and due to the fact it may find them subject to penalty if it is later determined that the response was wrong.  Alpha will attempt to skirt this issue citing the fact that it was in Chapter 11 bankruptcy.  MPO will keep you posted.

Filed Under: legal, Luck-McMahon

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed https://mmapayout.com/2026/05/11/ufc-freedom-250-kits-revealed/

Unpopular opinion: Kevin Harlan just yells #NBA #Lakers #FOKC

Marcus Smart with a play #Lakers

The guy sold the team to OKC claiming they’d build something in Seattle

Wall Street Journal Opinion @WSJopinion

Seattle turns hostile to the great businesses it made. Starbucks is moving jobs from Washington state to Tennessee, and it isn’t alone in looking elsewhere, writes @HowardSchultz
https://on.wsj.com/4uCiVCD

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

How did Loeffler/360 Promotions rebuild interest in Bohachuk after he lost to Adams the first time?
Why does any promoter, if they still have the rights to the fighter, continue their agreement after a loss?
An attorney and former boxing manager's thoughts (archived):

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports