• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Dana White vows to go after PPV pirates

January 13, 2021 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

As UFC 257 kicks off the 2021 PPV year, Dana White has issued a warning for those trying to steal it. 

During his media time this week for this Saturday night’s UFC Fight Night, he indicated that he would go after those trying to steal the PPV.  This infers that the UFC will attempt to sue individuals.  In the past, the UFC has sued bars that aired the fight without paying the appropriate license to show the event.

Based on White’s adamant response to those that may steal the company’s PPV, it appears that Zuffa will be more aggressive with its anti-piracy efforts.  The company raised its PPV price point $5 to $69.99 for 2021.  This, in addition, to the ESPN+ monthly fee of $5.99 or $59.99 annually.

It should be noted that the recent CARES ACT includes protections for Copyright holders which include up to 10 years in prison for those that have an illegal streaming operation defined as a “commercial, for-profit streaming piracy sevice.”  Based on the contents of the law, it would not apply to individuals that are trying to pirate a PPV one-time. 

Payout Perspective:

The protection of copyrighted material is of paramount importance for owners.  One may argue curbing pirates allows for more PPV revenue. But to go after perceived fans of the company is an extension of anti-piracy efforts.  Conversely, you might argue that those that pirate the UFC events are not actually fans since they are not actually patrons but steal content.  As indicated, its not out of the ordinary for companies to go after pirates. In most instances, copyright holders go after coordinated websites or organizations that have a spot for illegal streams.  But it would seem that Zuffa will be more vigilant in going after people this year. 

Filed Under: legal, piracy, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed https://mmapayout.com/2026/05/11/ufc-freedom-250-kits-revealed/

Unpopular opinion: Kevin Harlan just yells #NBA #Lakers #FOKC

Marcus Smart with a play #Lakers

The guy sold the team to OKC claiming they’d build something in Seattle

Wall Street Journal Opinion @WSJopinion

Seattle turns hostile to the great businesses it made. Starbucks is moving jobs from Washington state to Tennessee, and it isn’t alone in looking elsewhere, writes @HowardSchultz
https://on.wsj.com/4uCiVCD

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

How did Loeffler/360 Promotions rebuild interest in Bohachuk after he lost to Adams the first time?
Why does any promoter, if they still have the rights to the fighter, continue their agreement after a loss?
An attorney and former boxing manager's thoughts (archived):

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports