• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Ring City, USA sued by promoter for alleged breach of agreement

November 4, 2020 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

A lawsuit was filed in New Jersey Superior Court against an upstart boxing company, Ring City USA by Greg Cohen.  The lawsuit claims that the company left him out of the partnership while taking his idea.

The lawsuit claims that Cohen, a boxing promoter, would be a part of an upstart boxing promotion that would focus on the regional scene in the sport rather than attempting to compete with the other named promotions for talent.   It would use fighters that were not affiliated with any promoter, build the talent, gain momentum through small venues and regions and own the rights to sell to regional sports networks.

Complaint by MMA Payout

Not helping his credibility, Cohen spent time in federal prison on an unrelated matter per the lawsuit.

Cohen met with Frank Samuel, who owns and operates a part of Offabbot, Inc. a media production company that created Ring City, USA.  According to the Complaint, Offabbot Sports is the company that operates Ring City, USA.  Cohen met with Samuel in May 2018 after a Showtime event in Philadelphia.  Cohen claims that the two discussed and agreed to combine the companies to create a “New Boxing Business.”

Boxing attorney and podcaster Kurt Emhoff was added to the company along with another podcaster Evan Rutkowski (known as Fistiandos Podcast).  They were also sued by Cohen.

Cohen claims that he helped create a detailed business plan, a portion of which was put into a Business Presentation (presumably for prospective investors and/or networks).  He also introduced Samuel and Offabbott to other promoters. The plan includes a list of investors.  One of which is Tampa Bay Buccaneers defensive lineman Ndamukong Suh. 

Cohen claims that he was left out of a partnership despite initially coming up with a business plan.  He claims that the partners named in the lawsuit breached an oral promise for Cohen to be a member of the partnership.  In addition to several other claims Cohen has as a result of being excluded from the partnership, he requests that the court order that he be made a part of the partnership and be entitled to future profits of the business and any businesses arising out of Ring City, USA.

Payout Perspective:

The lawsuit is as interesting as the business plan that Ring City, USA intends to implement.  The business plan seeks to focus on the regional circuit and staying away from sports networks/promoter rivalries.  They advocated for no “showcase” or “busy” fights where there are obvious mismatches in matchmaking to the advantage of one fighter.  The business plan sought to have events every other week so that it would not compete with other sports including other boxing or MMA events.  As for its media it hopes to sell, it is looking to the regional sports networks as well as national streaming rights via Facebook, YouTube, and/or Hulu.

Cohen essentially claims that he was excluded from a partnership after he was used for information to develop a business plan. He does claim that he provided the input and has the necessary contacts in the business with fighters. The claims are analogous to a lawsuit where someone sues another claiming they stole their idea for a movie or book. Those lawsuits tend to not favor the plaintiff as the likely counter argument is that the information was readily known and was the unique. The fact Cohen didn’t put the partnership in writing also hurts as well as his incarceration.

MPO will keep you posted.

Filed Under: boxing, Featured, legal

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Plaintiffs file Answering Brief in Cirkunov Antitrust Appeal

Jai Opetaia files a lawsuit against IBF

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court

Plaintiffs highlight outstanding discovery in Johnson antitrust case

UFC 329 Payout Perspective

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Were all four satisfied in the Senate version? #TKO #AliAct #Zuffa #ZuffaBoxing #Boxing

Ariel Helwani @arielhelwani

Nico Ali Walsh breaks down the four major changes he wants included in the revised Zuffa Boxing Revival Act:

"In layman's terms, financial transparency is absolutely essential—UBO disclosures, fighter pay. You've got to be able to show what money is being made.

Free agency.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Re: Haney/Davis

The WBO congratulates Top Rank, Inc. on securing the promotional rights for the WBO Welterweight Championship contest between Devin Haney and Keyshawn Davis with a winning purse bid of $8,550,000.

Purse Distribution:
• Devin Haney: $6,412,500 (75%)
• Keyshawn

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

@MMAPayout “Sad to see once great publication like NYT become yellow pages.”

A little too on the nose while tweeting from the official Ring account

The Trumpification of the press

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

This is a totally normal thing for a boxing outlet to post.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports