• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

DAZN, Golden Boy both request dismissal of Canelo case in favor of arbitration

October 26, 2020 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

On Monday afternoon, Golden Boy Boxing filed a Statement with the Court regarding Arbitration notifying the Court and Canelo Alvarez that they will enforce the arbitration provision found in Canelo’s Promotional Contract.  Later that evening, DAZN filed a similar Statement with the court and in addition requested that the lawsuit be dismissed.

The parties to the lawsuit filed in the Central District of California had until October 26th to file the disputed contracts and a statement as to whether they would impose arbitration provisions in the contract alluded to in their filings.

Citing the arbitration language in its contract with Alvarez, Golden Boy indicated that it would enforce the provision thus ending the lawsuit, at least with Oscar De La Hoya’s promotion. 

Anticipating that Canelo would balk at compelling arbitration, Golden Boy argues that the dispute arises out of the contractual relationship the promotion has with its fighter.  Thus, any issues DAZN may have with it or Canelo are not within the ambit of Golden Boy.

DAZN noted that it too would enforce its contractual right to submit this case to binding arbitration as well. In the alternative, it requested that the Court just dismiss the case in total.

Notably, the filing by DAZN indicates that Alvarez signed a deed at the same time he signed his Promotional contract with Golden Boy. The pleading states that Alvarez signed the deed acknowledging the contract “and agreed to comply with certain obligations under that contract (the “Deed”).”

Similar to Golden Boy, DAZN argues that all of Canelo’s allegations, even those not related to his Breach of Contract claims still come under the contract and therefore are subject to the arbitration provisions. Below DAZN argues that a tortious interference claim were “legitimate exercise of rights under the DAZN contract.” Further, even Canelo’s claim that he is entitled to a declaratory judgment freeing him from his contractual obligations would still be subject to the contract terms.

The DAZN contract, the Deed and the Golden Boy Promotional Contract have all been filed with the court but under seal meaning they are private and only can be seen by the Court.

In all likelihood, Canelo’s lawyers will now argue that the case should remain in Court rather than arbitration and that the claims brought by Canelo are outside the scope of the contract(s). This is where the possibility of a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction would come into play. These remedies occur prior to final resolution of a case. If successful it would halt the move to arbitration pending hearing further evidence. Yet, Canelo has yet to do this.

Payout Perspective:

The big takeaway from the latest round of filings is that Canelo signed a deed with DAZN. While not mentioned by Canelo in his lawsuit, this would mean that he did have some sort of agreement yet did not bring a breach of contract agreement with DAZN. It would seem as though this Deed bound Canelo to abide by what it said and one might assume it allowed DAZN (among other things) pick, or at least, have some type of authority on who he could fight.

Arbitration provisions in contract are usually held up in Court so this litigation is coming to a head quickly. Canelo will need to persuade this court that his claims fall outside the scope of the provisions. MPO will continue to follow.

Filed Under: boxing, Canelo v. Golden Boy - DAZN, Featured, legal

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Plaintiffs file Answering Brief in Cirkunov Antitrust Appeal

Jai Opetaia files a lawsuit against IBF

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court

Plaintiffs highlight outstanding discovery in Johnson antitrust case

UFC 329 Payout Perspective

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Were all four satisfied in the Senate version? #TKO #AliAct #Zuffa #ZuffaBoxing #Boxing

Ariel Helwani @arielhelwani

Nico Ali Walsh breaks down the four major changes he wants included in the revised Zuffa Boxing Revival Act:

"In layman's terms, financial transparency is absolutely essential—UBO disclosures, fighter pay. You've got to be able to show what money is being made.

Free agency.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Re: Haney/Davis

The WBO congratulates Top Rank, Inc. on securing the promotional rights for the WBO Welterweight Championship contest between Devin Haney and Keyshawn Davis with a winning purse bid of $8,550,000.

Purse Distribution:
• Devin Haney: $6,412,500 (75%)
• Keyshawn

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

@MMAPayout “Sad to see once great publication like NYT become yellow pages.”

A little too on the nose while tweeting from the official Ring account

The Trumpification of the press

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

This is a totally normal thing for a boxing outlet to post.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports