• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Chavez, Jr. files lawsuit against NAC

December 5, 2019 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

MPO has obtained the Complaint filed by boxer Julio Cesar Chavez, Jr. against the Nevada Athletic Commission for declining a drug test administered by the Commission. The boxer hopes to prevail with an injunction filed in conjunction with the Complaint as he has a fight December 20, 2019 in Phoenix, Arizona that is at risk of being cancelled.

The lawsuit, filed in Clark County, Nevada, argues that Chavez did not hold a Nevada boxer’s license and was not subject to a NAC drug test.  According to the Complaint, an October 24, 2019 drug test at the Wild Card Boxing Club in Hollywood, California was turned down by Chavez.  As a result, on November 20, 2019 the NAC issued a temporary suspension to Chavez for his failure to participate in the drug test.  Chavez contends that since he was not licensed by the Commission, he had no obligation to participate in the drug testing process. He also argued in his complaint that the suspension of an unlicensed boxer is not permitted by law.

Chavez, Jr. is scheduled to fight Daniel Jacobs in Phoenix, Arizona on December 20th.  The fight, originally scheduled for the MGM Grand Garden Arena on the same date, was moved to Phoenix due to the November 20th ruling by the NAC.  The lawsuit hopes to allow Chavez, Jr. to fight despite the denial of a drug test.

A preliminary injunction will take place to determine whether Chavez, Jr. can fight on December 20th.  If granted, the fight is on, if not, one might expect that it would add to any potential damages in the lawsuit.

Complaint by Jason Cruz on Scribd

Payout Perspective:

Its important to note that Ross Goodman is the attorney for Chavez, Jr.  He also represented Wanderlei Silva in a similar case which went up to the Nevada State Supreme Court to address the issue of whether the NAC had jurisdiction over an unarmed combatant not licensed within the state.  The State Supreme Court did not issue a ruling as the underlying issues regarding Silva’s ban was not clarified by the commission.  Thus, there was no clear ruling on the issue.  Here, Goodman may get a second chance to determine what might be a loophole in the NAC code.  MMA Payout will keep you posted.

 

Filed Under: boxing, Jr., legal

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

TKO announce Q3 earnings

UFC 333 bonuses

FBI seeking no-bid contract with the UFC

Court denies Top Rank’s Motion to Dismiss in Keane case

Opetaia fires back at IBF in opposition to MTD

UFC 331 Payout Perspective

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Fudd getting traded now?

Ball Don’t Lie @Balldontlie

Paige Bueckers and Azzi Fudd announced that they are no longer together on the @fuddaroundpod.

The pair said they have not been together for over a year, and emphasized they're still going to be great friends and teammates.

Cardsmiths Sues Mickey Mantle IP Over Disputed Topps Rookie Card via @sportico

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Oh my god @ContextFreeCBB we have MAYHEM in Hofstra-Princeton.

Report indicates #WWE crew offered hazard pay for Saudi trip https://mmapayout.com/2026/11/05/report-indicates-wwe-crew-offered-hazard-pay-for-saudi-trip/

FanDuel’s Latest Crossroads: Digital Card Rips via @sportico

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports