• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Report: Endeavor wanted 65-35 split with DirecTV

March 18, 2019 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

John Ourand of the Sports Business Journal reports that sources stated that Endeavor wanted a 65-35 split of the PPV revenue from DirecTV before deciding to sign a deal with ESPN+.

On Monday, it was announced that the UFC and ESPN had entered into an agreement which would place ESPN+ as the exclusive provider of UFC PPVs.  The move terminated the UFC’s relationship with its other satellite and cable PPV distributors.

Although not confirmed, the standard revenue split between is 50/50 with the distributor assist in promoting the event over its own platform while the UFC providing the event.  It’s been clear that the UFC was seeking a way for better terms or leave altogether.

First, its UFC Fight Pass allowed for fans to purchase the PPV digitally without going through a middle-man.  As fans became comfortable with the technology, fans became more confident in the product.  It has offered fans the opportunity to purchase it through other means that traditional cable/satellite such as through Amazon.

Rumblings began that the UFC sought better terms from distributors.  There was the possibility that DirecTV would not show UFC 234.  However, Dana White brokered a last minute deal with DTV so that subscribers would be able to see 234 through the satellite company.

A deal with InDemand seemed set according to Ourand, but was never signed.  Per Ourand, he was told that the UFC wanted 65% of the PPV revenue from its events.  But, DirecTV balked.

From John Ourand. Endeavor wanted a 65-35 split with DTV. It had a deal with InDemand but nothing was signed. #ufc pic.twitter.com/EhjK8umTK9

— Jason Cruz (@dilletaunt) March 19, 2019

Payout Perspective:

What we can initially glean from this is that the UFC believes it has bargaining power with distributors.  There position is likely strengthened from how well its done thus far on ESPN and its recent success with several PPV events.  While not every event will draw 500K buys, it still is in the black when it comes to events.  It also reflects the belief that there is a shift in viewership.  The UFC and ESPN fan base are comfortable with technology and are willing to move to ESPN+ as the sole provider of its content (outside of bars and restaurants that contract with the UFC to air PPVs).

Filed Under: ESPN, Featured, TV

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Government response to citizen lawsuit attempting to stop UFC White House

Lawsuit seeks to shutdown UFC White House event

Johnson plaintiffs take a renewed aim at Dominance in antitrust lawsuit

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

From the Judge's Order today denying the injunction. The Court states that plaintiffs did not have a specific harm to satisfy the threshold for an injunction #UFCWhiteHouse #TKO #UFC

Judge Amit Mehta, the judge that denied the #UFC White House injunction, was a Obama appointee. Just another reason to Blame Obama

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Only 16% of Americans approve of Trump holding UFC event at White House.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ALERT: Judge Amit Metha rules UFC event can proceed at White House, ruling harm to plaintiffs would only be "temporary" & that the challenge came too late

"Considerable time, labor & funding.. has gone into organizing the UFC fight and lead-up events"

Full contact 5 days a week 😂

MMA Mania @mmamania

Mania Mailbag: Do we trane UFC? https://www.mmamania.com/mma-mailbag-questions-answers-ufc/449583/mania-mailbag-do-we-trane-ufc?utm_campaign=dhtwitter&utm_content=%3Cmedia_url%3E&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports