• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order issued in UFC Antitrust Case

June 15, 2017 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

On Tuesday of this week, the parties in the Zuffa Antitrust Lawsuit filed its Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order.  The order is a result of the Motion to Compel and Motion to Quash earlier this month.

The order extends fact discovery to July 31, 2017.  Expert reports and expert deposition will go through the fall of 2017 with all expert reports in by 2017.  Class certification, the motion to determine whether or not the lawsuit will be a class action will commence on January 26, 2018 and the hearing on class certification will occur on the Court’s convenience.

Summary Judgment motions, motions that could dismiss the case, will be due on July 9, 2018.  Opposition to the motions will be due a month later, on August 8, 2018 and Reply Briefs will not be due until a month later, September 17, 2018.

You can expect dispositive motions (Summary Judgment) to occur with both sides filing something either the UFC dismissing all of Plaintiffs’ claims or Plaintiffs filing summary judgment on the UFC’s defense or defenses.  Both sides will likely request oral argument and sometime thereafter there should be a ruling.  Either the Court will grant or deny or issues partial granting or denial of certain issues.

After that, there will likely be a trial in the late fall of 2018 or early 2019.  Of course, recall that it took over a year for Judge Richard Boulware to issue a written opinion.  So, the timeline may be longer dependent on when the Court issues a ruling.  There’s really no hard deadline for the Court to issue an opinion, so this could take some time.

With fact discovery extended until July 31, 2017, it appears that new discovery (i.e., written interrogatories, request for production of documents, etc.) can be served.  Zuffa had argued that Plaintiffs should not have the opportunity to request additional discovery.

Discovery Plan 06.13.17 by JASONCRUZ206 on Scribd

Filed Under: Antitrust Class Action, Le v. Zuffa, legal, UFC, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC 331 Payout Perspective

UFC 331 attendance, gate and bonuses

Scott Coker is back with Ki MMA

TKO owns this weekend

Appeals Court sets date for oral argument in Zuffa appeal

Don King sends Zuffa Boxing cease and desist

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

As our sun sets here in Connecticut, we’re grateful to have shared the court with a team whose story is just beginning.

Thank you, @TempoBasketball . 🫶

#GoldenHour | #CTSun | @TDBank_US

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

JUST IN: Seattle named the 4th "greatest city in the world" for 2026, trailing only New York, London, & Paris.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

“How does it feel to celebrate with everyone?”

“I AM JAPANEESSSEEE!!!”

“Damn”

Jermaine Wilson | CP24/CTV News @Jerrmainewilson

Scottie Barnes had a little fun crashing @CTVSean live hit this afternoon. Here's his reaction to the Kawhi Leonard deal😂

Full story: https://www.cp24.com/local/toronto/2026/09/24/raptors-scottie-barnes-crashes-cp24-live-hit/

Since Yoel Romero is fighting this weekend, I assume he never got that $28M default judgment from that supplement company

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports