• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Federal magistrate in LA transfer Bellator’s Motion to Quash UFC Subpoena to Nevada

March 18, 2017 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

A Los Angeles Federal Magistrate Judge has transferred Bellator’s Motion to Quash Zuffa’s Subpoenas to the Nevada court hearing the antitrust lawsuit.  The decision to transfer venue was made on Friday March 17th and done without oral argument.

Citing “exceptional circumstances” pursuant to the federal rules governing subpoenas, it determined that the “interests in favor of transfer outweigh the interests of Bellator in obtaining local resolution of the subpoena-related motions.”

Bellator, a non-party in the antitrust lawsuit, sought relief from a UFC subpoena requesting certain documents including information related to specific fighter contracts including information related to negotiations, terminations, cancellations and transfer of contracts.  Bellator has provided the UFC with documents but reached an impasse on certain information.

The federal magistrate, which ordered the transfer, pointed to the looming May 1, 2017 fact discovery deadline, the Nevada court issued the protective order and the Nevada magistrate had been active in previous discovery as reasons for the transfer.

Moreover, the court determined that Bellator would not be inconvenienced by having to appear in Nevada citing the possibility of appearing telephonically.  Alternatively, the proximity between California and Nevada would make the travel negligible.

Payout Perspective:

If you were to ask me, it appears that California did not want anything to do with the Motion.  Rather, it kicked it back to Nevada to deal with the details of the Motion and the lawsuit.  In most instances, Bellator did the appropriate thing in filing for relief where their business is primarily located but the court found reasons to negate the inconvenience.  For the UFC, it’s a win as the issue will go before the magistrate that has been dealing with the UFC and plaintiffs since the case was transferred from a Norther California federal court back in June 2015.

MMA Payout will have more on this.  Stay tuned.

Filed Under: Bellator, Featured, legal, UFC, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Conor McGregor returns July 11th

Keane’s attorneys fire back at Top Rank based on undiscovered evidence

White writes letter to Trump requesting change to law

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Pistons wyd

Agree with whole interaction 👍🏾

BaseballHistoryNut @nut_history

A fan to PCA: you suck

PCA: you suck my f**king d**k bit*h

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Been a big supporter of his, but I’ve seen enough. Heads need to roll to answer for the way this team is performing.

Fire Dan Wilson.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

I don’t disagree with the criticism of the quality of the fights here but the amount of time spent rehashing old comments from Rousey & Carano in a sport where open bigots, accused rapist & friends of war criminals & cartel bosses regularly get top billing seems overboard.

One of my first big gets

K-Dub @MrKdub

Modern collectors will NEVER understand this… #TheHobby

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports