• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

UFC Fight Night 88 draws 757K, Prelims 469K

June 2, 2016 by Jason Cruz 3 Comments

Sports TV Ratings reports that UFC Fight Night 88 on Sunday night drew an average of 757,000 viewers.  The prelims which preceded the main card on FS1 drew 469,000 viewers.

The Memorial Day weekend card featuring Thomas Almeida facing Cody Garbrandt drew 381,000 viewers in the adult 18-49 rating.  The prelims drew 227,000 viewers in the same demo.

UFC Fight Night 2016
Main Card Prelims
UFC Fight Night 81 2,288,000 1,767,000
UFC Fight Night 82 1,300,000 1,093,000
UFC Fight Night 83 983,000 829,000
UFC Fight Night 85 1,149,000 766,000
UFC Fight Night 86 781,000 443,000
UFC Fight Night 87 656,000 494,000
UFC Fight Night 88 757,000 469,000

Payout Perspective:

The main card, which aired Sunday night, was a slight increase (14%) from Fight Night 87 which was a Sunday afternoon card.  Notably, the last Sunday night card was UFC Fight Night 83 which did quite well drawing 983,000 viewers and 869,000 viewers for the prelims.  Holding a card on Sunday night of a 3-day weekend was a risk especially when the card did not feature top-named stars.

Filed Under: FS1, ratings, TV, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Wil says

    June 3, 2016 at 3:22 am

    there is no doubt that in terms of combat sports promotions in any of the 3 combat sports shown on American tv that the UFC has the best consistent ratings. They really have solidified their hold on the millennial suburban demographic

    Reply
  2. Combo says

    June 3, 2016 at 9:26 pm

    I concur, Wil. UFC provides a fairly consistent product, reflected in the ratings.

    Cards are fairly stacked and balanced compared to other combat sports (especially boxing). Hell, even the prelims are popular enough to be televised.

    Another great card this Saturday.

    Reply
  3. Joe says

    June 4, 2016 at 11:16 pm

    I argued last year that UFC had a healthy enough profit to double fighter pay:

    http://mmapayout.com/2015/05/coker-comments-on-ufc-reebok-sponsor-policy/

    Turn out I was right …

    “Here’s a few notes on UFC finances and these aren’t estimates but actual numbers. In 2014, UFC grossed $449,008,000 and posted a $73,957,000 profit. That was the year everything went wrong with injuries and such. In 2015, the year Ronda Rousey and Conor McGregor got hot, they grossed $608,629,000 and posted a $157,806,000 profit. As compared with WWE, they grossed slightly less but posted more than six times the profit. It should be noted that doesn’t include interest payments on their loans, which were $22,797,000 in 2014 and $21,767,000 in 2015.”

    With all this info leaking it will be interesting to see where the business goes. Especially with the Ali Act…

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Joe Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Ortiz files motion to confirm injunction over

Congressional Report on Ali Revival Act released

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Was Team USA skipper - and his staff of buddies - merit-based hires or DEI? We report, you decide

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Is Kash Patel headed to the clubhouse tonight? Anyone have the speakerphone ready?

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

“Mark ReRosa, we’re down 2 in the WBC finals! Do something!”

Mark DeRosa:

If you hate Aaron Judge, why did you make him MVP last year?

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Team USA’s offense when the crowd gets over 100 decibels

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports