• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Nevada State Athletic Commission and Nick Diaz in settlement talks

October 28, 2015 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

MMA Fighting reports that representatives for Nick Diaz and the Nevada State Athletic Commission are discussion a potential settlement of his fine and punishment issued last month.

Sources told MMA Fighting that with settlement talks ongoing, Diaz could be back in the Octagon by 2016.  Amy Dardashtian also indicated that the best case scenario is that he is in the Octagon as early as this summer.

Last month, the commission issued a 5 year suspension and fined Diaz $165,000 for failing a drug test for marijuana at UFC 183.  The contentious hearing drew the ire of many fans which felt that Diaz was wrongly prosecuted and unfairly penalized.  Diaz’s lawyers stated that they would file a lawsuit against the NSAC seeking judicial review.  Notably, the NSAC never issued a written finding of Diaz’s suspension and fine per NSAC rules.  Only after the written order is issued and sent to Diaz’s representations could his lawyers file suit.

Interesting enough, Las Vegas law firm Campbell & Williams stepped in on the fighter’s behalf per a twitter post by Diaz.

@ufc put me in touch with their lawyers at Campbell & Williams and they will also be helping me with the NSAC

— nick diaz (@nickdiaz209) September 30, 2015

Campbell & Williams represents the UFC in a variety of matters.  It is the law firm that is representing the UFC in the Wanderlei Silva defamation case.

Payout Perspective:

Clearly, the local influence of Campbell & Williams must have facilitated settlement talks.  Further, the fact that no written order was issued meant that no legal action would be pursued.  I would have to check the NSAC rules to see if there was a time limit for which they needed to issue an order.  Perhaps the NSAC did not figure that the Diaz penalty would have caused such a stir within the MMA community.  But, in the end, we should probably see the sides settle with the proviso that Diaz is able to participate in the Octagon sooner than later.

Filed Under: legal, NSAC, regulation, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Injunction filed against Mayweather from fighting this Saturday

The UFC’s undying loyalty to Trump

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit claim White’s devices “wiped” intentionally

Alex Periera accused of sexual assault, coercive sexual encounters, stalking

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Injunction filed against Mayweather from fighting this Saturday https://mmapayout.com/2026/06/21/injunction-filed-against-mayweather-from-fighting-this-saturday/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

@Josh_HokitUFC You’re gonna cry you were cancelled by the left for “free speech”. And then you’ll post 200 times a day on Twitter until fox and friends invites you on to “tell your story”. And after that you’ll run for congress and your campaign will be centered on white grievance.

This is

Real question. Was this announced or is there an intern somewhere that is taking note of ever fighter’s follow and unfollow?

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

Ian Garry unfollowed PFL fighter Alexei Pergande after a clip resurfaced of him taking down Garry in sparring:

"Ian Garry is lying about me... I'm not sure why he made up a lie [about me filming him without permission]."

(via alexei_pergande/TT)

Great another weird move white belts will try on me in class Monday #bjj

ACD MMA @acdmma_

HOLY SHIT

THE FIRST SCOTTISH TWISTER IN UFC HISTORY BY MURTAZALI MAGOMEDOV 😮

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports