• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Nevada State Athletic Commission and Nick Diaz in settlement talks

October 28, 2015 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

MMA Fighting reports that representatives for Nick Diaz and the Nevada State Athletic Commission are discussion a potential settlement of his fine and punishment issued last month.

Sources told MMA Fighting that with settlement talks ongoing, Diaz could be back in the Octagon by 2016.  Amy Dardashtian also indicated that the best case scenario is that he is in the Octagon as early as this summer.

Last month, the commission issued a 5 year suspension and fined Diaz $165,000 for failing a drug test for marijuana at UFC 183.  The contentious hearing drew the ire of many fans which felt that Diaz was wrongly prosecuted and unfairly penalized.  Diaz’s lawyers stated that they would file a lawsuit against the NSAC seeking judicial review.  Notably, the NSAC never issued a written finding of Diaz’s suspension and fine per NSAC rules.  Only after the written order is issued and sent to Diaz’s representations could his lawyers file suit.

Interesting enough, Las Vegas law firm Campbell & Williams stepped in on the fighter’s behalf per a twitter post by Diaz.

@ufc put me in touch with their lawyers at Campbell & Williams and they will also be helping me with the NSAC

— nick diaz (@nickdiaz209) September 30, 2015

Campbell & Williams represents the UFC in a variety of matters.  It is the law firm that is representing the UFC in the Wanderlei Silva defamation case.

Payout Perspective:

Clearly, the local influence of Campbell & Williams must have facilitated settlement talks.  Further, the fact that no written order was issued meant that no legal action would be pursued.  I would have to check the NSAC rules to see if there was a time limit for which they needed to issue an order.  Perhaps the NSAC did not figure that the Diaz penalty would have caused such a stir within the MMA community.  But, in the end, we should probably see the sides settle with the proviso that Diaz is able to participate in the Octagon sooner than later.

Filed Under: legal, NSAC, regulation, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC 330 Payout Perspective

Update on CSI Entertainment – Mayweather lawsuit, Injunction request withdrawn

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit file statement prior to status conference

Despite two big losses, TKO touts another solid quarter

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

😂 I’m sorry, @Mariners, he’s perfect. #TridentsUp #GoMs

I was wrong

MMA Payout @MMAPayout

This game over already

This game over already

I hate how this sounds like he needs money ASAP

MMA Junkie @MMAJunkie

Ex-UFC champ Tyron Woodley willing to wrestle for RAF, box, and do MMA https://mmajunkie.usatoday.com/story/sports/ufc/2026/08/21/tyron-woodley-never-retired-from-mma-ufc-raf-wrestling-vs-joaquin-buckley-boxing-future-plans/91402718007/?taid=6a88cbc32f77dd0001a5b25f&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=twitter

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports