• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Zuffa retains former Solicitor General for NY appeal

April 23, 2015 by Jason Cruz 3 Comments

The legal fight in New York is not over yet. This week, the UFC announced that it has retained former U.S. Solicitor General, Paul Clement to appeal Judge Kimba Wood’s dismissal of Zuffa’s lawsuit in New York.

Via the UFC release:

The judge’s dismissal of the UFC’s case against the State of New York in March was based on a technicality, and the decision confirms the state is misapplying the law. UFC was advised by the judge to “consider filing new vagueness claims.” Wood also stated the New York Attorney General’s “recent statements that the Ban prohibits sanctioned MMA” were made “despite [the law’s] plain language to the contrary.” UFC also believes that Judge Wood erred in failing to recognize the serious First Amendment problems with the New York law.

Clement’s job as Solicitor General required him to be the representative of the federal government before the U.S. Supreme Court. He has argued over 75 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court according to his law firm bio.

If Zuffa were to appeal the judge ruling (which we should know soon), it will go to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

UPDATE:  Zuffa has filed its official Notice of Appeal to the Second Circuit.  It not only will appeal the Court’s dismissal of the vagueness claim, but the other causes of action previously dismissed.

Payout Perspective:

The retention of Clement certainly means we shall see an appeal of Judge Wood’s dismissal. It appears that the appeal will encompass not only the recent dispositive motion dismissing Zuffa’s claim that the New York law is unconstitutionally vague but also the causes of action dismissed previously by Judge Wood which includes the UFC’s argument that the New York law violates the First Amendment.

Clement has had his share of sports law cases in his past including representing the NBA during labor negotiations in 2011, NFL v. Brady (which was filed during the NFL lockout in 2011) and NCAA v. Governor of New Jersey II (regarding the fight to legalize sports gambling in New Jersey).

Filed Under: legal, New York, regulation, UFC, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. saldathief says

    April 23, 2015 at 2:16 pm

    more money for the lawyers, the way things are going the UFC will get hurt in NYC if they try to do a big show anyhow. Find some shitty Indian reservation and do a show there lol

    Reply
  2. d says

    April 23, 2015 at 9:24 pm

    Sal once more with his idiotic rants.

    Reply
  3. tops E says

    April 23, 2015 at 11:13 pm

    Non news….ufc ny was due 6 years ago…..yawn

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Zuffa files Reply Brief in Cirkunov Antitrust Lawsuit

UFC 330 Payout Perspective

Update on CSI Entertainment – Mayweather lawsuit, Injunction request withdrawn

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit file statement prior to status conference

Despite two big losses, TKO touts another solid quarter

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Hot take: UW d stinks #applecup

Arroyo coming and will likely sit for Taylor Ward for some reason #Mariners

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Mariners are promoting Michael Arroyo, their No. 1 hitting prospect, from Triple-A Tacoma today.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

LEARN THE NAME‼️

20-year-old Learner Tien becomes the youngest American man to reach the second week of the US Open since Andy Roddick in 2002 🇺🇸

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Andy ‘The Butcher’ Williams passes away at 48

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports