• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Silva stopped from making appearance at Bellator pre-party

November 12, 2014 by Jason Cruz 1 Comment

MMA Junkie reports that Wanderlei Silva will not participate at a pre-party Friday to promote Bellator 131 due to a contractual issue with the UFC.  The announcement comes just a day after Bellator sent a press release announcing his appearance.

Due to prior contractual obligations, Wanderlei Silva will not be able to participate in #Bellator131‘s pre-promotion this week

— Bellator MMA (@BellatorMMA) November 11, 2014

Silva was to appear with other former UFC veterans including Royce Gracie, Frank Shamrock and Randy Couture.

Payout Perspective:

It’s an obvious failure to communicate on behalf of Bellator and Silva.  Certainly, Bellator should have checked out whether or not Silva could legally make an appearance at a Bellator event.  Without seeing Silva’s actual Zuffa contract, he likely had a non-compete clause or some language within the contract stating that he could not make an appearance for another organization while still under contract with the UFC.  And, it’s highly unlikely that the UFC would have granted Silva the opportunity to appear at Friday’s event and waive any legalities.  Even though he has been suspended by the NAC, it does not mean his UFC contract has been terminated yet.  It’s apparent that the UFC

Filed Under: Bellator, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. john_frederickson says

    November 12, 2014 at 10:41 am

    Non competes are not needed….there are a lot of other legal principles that would prevent an employee from joining a competitor…. Doctrine of Inevitable Disclosure says if you’re a “key employee” the company pretty much owns your brain [the knowledge you have about your company’s practices/products/ IP]..the company gets to decide where/ or to which company the employee’s brain can go ..also there are corporate/economic espionage laws that either party could throw around and make allegations and tie up bellator in expensive litigation…..

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC 330 Payout Perspective

Update on CSI Entertainment – Mayweather lawsuit, Injunction request withdrawn

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit file statement prior to status conference

Despite two big losses, TKO touts another solid quarter

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

😂🤣😂

Dan Canobbio @DanCanobbio

The Money Team Law Firm

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

#Zuffa filed its Reply Brief in its appeal to the 9th Circuit in the Cirkunov antitrust lawsuit. Appeal is based on district court's decision to determine whether defendants held monopoly/monopsony power and whether the contract clauses were unsconsionable #UFC

2

The mysterious $11M man or woman #UFC https://mmapayout.com/2026/08/26/the-mysterious-11m-man-or-woman/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Thank you Seattle for the privilege. How often can anyone buy a Super Bowl winning team? Humbled.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports