• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Condit tattoo missing from UFC video game

June 20, 2014 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Earlier this week, EA Sports released the latest UFC video game which includes many of your favorite UFC fighters including Carlos Condit.  However, gamers may notice that Condit will not have the lion tattoo that is on the side of his body for legal reasons.

As  the Wall Street Journal reports, the tattoo was removed from the video game as a precaution from infringing on any copyright issue that Condit’s tattoo artist may have with its use.  Previously, Condit’s tattoo artist sued defunct video game maker THQ for the unauthorized use of the tattoo in UFC Undisputed.  Long story short, Escobedo asked for millions, the Bankruptcy Court quantified the use to the sum of $22,500 (the amount Condit was paid for the use of his likeness).

Condit tattoo

The move to digitally airbrush Condit of his tattoo underscores a big issue the National Football League Players’ Association (and likely other leagues) is facing when it comes to player tattoos and digital rights.  One of the ways to protect itself from lawsuits is to have players get their tattoo artists sign releases.

Payout Perspective:

Authenticity is something that sports video games have and the inclusion of fighters’ facial features, hair style, mannerisms and even their tattoos are important. College football games have come under fire for similar issues and we may see the elimination of any identifiable feature your favorite college player may have in a game.   But that issue is a little different from the one here.  However, it is clear that If you are Carlos Condit, you might be concerned with the fact that your likeness is not exact, which may impact your overall future brand. That argument is a little far-fetched but the issue of re-imaging personas due to concerns about being sued is a slippery slope we may see in future video games.

Filed Under: legal, UFC, video games

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court

Plaintiffs highlight outstanding discovery in Johnson antitrust case

UFC 329 Payout Perspective

Does Conor McGregor still have the aura?

Court Memo and Order from CSI Entertainment-Mayweather TRO hearing

TKO responds to allegations of missing discovery in Johnson case

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The us number for the McGregor show was 6.1. Milllion. White House show was 7 million. Rousey fight was just over 9. But Netflix has a big advantage in homes.

Want to be an NIL attorney representing athletes? You don't get paid...really.

CSI Entertainment attorneys claim that Stephen Espinoza's declaration in support of Floyd #Mayweather is a #quidproquo as the boxer is suing Espinoza and #Showtime #Boxing

MMA Payout @MMAPayout

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court #boxing #Mayweather #sportslaw https://mmapayout.com/2026/07/20/parties-in-mayweather-csi-entertainment-lawsuit-provide-joint-letter-to-court/

First Texas, now Florida allows #UFC license plates

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

No one wants this

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports