• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Proposed amendment to Connecticut MMA law may hurt promoters

March 12, 2014 by Jason Cruz 4 Comments

A proposed revision to the existing law legalizing mixed martial arts in the state of Connecticut may inhibit MMA events in the state according to promoters.

The current law, which was enacted in 2013, makes MMA promoters liable for health care costs associated with fighters’ long-term injuries.

The statement of purpose for the bill states: “To require promoters of boxing, sparring or mixed martial arts matches to continuously provide health insurance for the protection of boxers and competitors.”

The proposed language would read as follows with the deletions being in brackets and additions being underlined.

Any person, firm or corporation that employs, or contracts with, a person to be a boxer or competitor in a boxing, sparring or mixed martial arts match conducted pursuant to this chapter shall [be liable for any health care costs incurred by such competitor for the diagnosis, care and treatment of any injury, illness, disease or condition resulting from or caused] continuously provide insurance for the protection of the boxer or competitor in matches produced by such person, firm or corporation. Such insurance coverage shall provide for total reimbursement to the boxer or competitor for medical, dental, surgical and hospital care for all injuries sustained by such boxer’s or competitor’s participation in such match. [for the duration of such injury, illness, disease or condition.] The Commissioner of Emergency Services and Public Protection shall adopt such regulations, in accordance with chapter 54, concerning the insurance required by the provisions of this section.

The proposed legislation would take effect on October 1, 2014.

CTPost.com identifies the big issue with the proposed language:

Promoters would be required to cover the cost of injuries into perpetuity, rather than simply for an incident and period of recovery as in most states and under the state’s boxing regulations.

Payout Perspective:

If you are a promoter of a small promotion that wants to hold events in the state, passage of this law would be debilitating.  Essentially, the added language to “continuously provide insurance” and “total reimbursement” that may result to a participant from a promoted event would be very costly.  Donald Williams, the state senator that introduced the amendment to the bill, accused MMA operators that balked at the amendment accusing them of “not wanting to be responsible for the full costs of injuries that they know will result in this sport.”

This is a tough measure and a similar bill is being proposed right now in Albany in an effort to legalize professional MMA in New York.  On one hand, you understand the intent of the amendment but on the other it would make it tough for a promotion to hold an event in the state.  Another issue, which does not seem to be discussed on the face of the bill is determining how much and how long care would go to an injured fighter.  This would also be a very tricky insurance issue as well.  We have also heard from promoters that indicate similar rules in other states are rarely followed.  This might be the reason for the addition of language.

MMA Payout will keep you posted.

Filed Under: Promoters, regulation

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. saldathief says

    March 12, 2014 at 3:41 pm

    The promoters just wont book fights in CT. It will cost CT jobs and revenue go figure. Ct is a shit market anyhow Hartford New Haven and a few casinos with smaller arenas.

    Reply
  2. BrainSmasher says

    March 12, 2014 at 7:56 pm

    What the hell does the guy mean by “injuries they know will result in the sport”? It sounds like this dumbass is accusing the sport of being overly dangerous and having long term health issues without having a single stitch of proof to back it up.

    It sounds like this guy doesn’t know what he is talking about. Let him stay ignorant and let the people of Connecticut pay for his stupidity as MMA events go back to the Indian Casinos like they used to. Let the Mohegan Sun reap the rewards.

    Reply
  3. Jason Cruz says

    March 13, 2014 at 6:23 am

    @BS – I think that’s what you will see if the amendment is passed – Tribal casinos holding more events in Conn. I think its the same thing that MMA proponents face in Albany when trying to get legislation passed for NY.

    Reply
  4. saldathief says

    March 13, 2014 at 6:58 am

    Just another ignorant, fool politician who has no clue about reality.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to saldathief Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Plaintiffs seeking $270K from Dominance MMA

UFC Seattle attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing #boxing #TKO #UFC #Zuffa #ZuffaBoxing https://mmapayout.com/2026/04/22/senate-makes-mockery-of-ali-act-hearing/

People who do martial arts will laugh and tell me it’s fake. But then I ask them why they do martial arts? 😉

Fightful Wrestling @Fightful

Fox Sports Host Rob Parker Doesn't Understand How Grown Men Are Into Wrestling https://www.fightful.com/wrestling/fox-sports-host-rob-parker-doesnt-understand-how-grown-men-are-into-wrestling

I saw Tamaso at SeaTac airport last Thursday

Roman Reigns SZN 💥 @reigns_era

Good god.

#AEWDynamite

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Per WWE,

#WrestleMania 42 became one of the highest-grossing events in company history, with record or near-record performances across gate, sponsorship, merchandise, WWE World, On Location VIP experiences and digital.

WrestleMania Saturday was the most-viewed telecast of the

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

I should point out that according to those at TKO that the ESPN/MVPW boxing deal is a revenue sharing agreement similar to the original AEW/Turner deal in 2019 and not a full paying media rights deal which Top Rank had and wasn't renewed.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports