• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Vitor Belfort out of UFC 173 title bout after NSAC TRT ban

February 28, 2014 by MMAPayout Moderator 9 Comments

Earlier in the day, the Nevada State Athletic Commission banned therapeutic use exemptions for testosterone treatment therapy (TRT), just a few hours after that announcement was made, UFC teased a big announcement would be aired on FOX Sports Live tonight.

Fox Sports Live reported that Vitor Belfort would not be applying for a Nevada license for UFC 173, which is scheduled to take place on May 24th, due to the NSAC ruling to ban TRT.  His replacement was announced to be Lyoto Machida after his recent win against Gegard Mousasi, which means the new UFC 173 headliner will be Weidman vs Machida.

Belfort claimed that he would now make the efforts to get off of TRT and continue to fight in the UFC without the testosterone therapy since other athletic commissions in the US would most likely follow the NSAC’s ruling.

 

Payout Perspective:

Today’s NSAC ruling on banning TRT will have a ripple effect on MMA for years to come. We got some of that today already, as Belfort’s announcement today to pull out of his fight three months in advance will cement his status as the face of the TRT era in Mixed Martial Arts and in the UFC.  The UFC is already in a tough spot to find headliners this year due to injuries and the impromptu departures of Georges St. Pierre (infinite leave) and Anderson Silva (injury), two of their biggest stars.

The buzz for a Weidman vs Machida main event in Las Vegas will not have the same feel as previous major events during the Summer time. This news puts even more pressure on Ronda Rousey to keep things going in 2014 as a number of UFC champions will continue to be sidelined from injuries suffered last year. As far as PPV numbers go so far in 2014, UFC 169 was estimated by Dave Meltzer to be in the low 200,000’s while UFC 170: Rousey vs McMann figures to do somewhere on the lower to mid end of 300,000 buys.  Factoring in today’s news of Belfort pulling out of UFC 173, it looks like it will be a tough first half of the year for UFC PPV sales.

Filed Under: Featured, NSAC, pay-per-view, regulation, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Diego says

    February 28, 2014 at 7:16 am

    I actually like TUEs because at least it’s supervised and prescribed use of steroids. Now all that use will go underground again.

    Reply
  2. Sampson Simpson says

    February 28, 2014 at 8:44 am

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahah

    Reply
  3. LeonThePro says

    February 28, 2014 at 8:44 am

    Wow, Dana must be having second thoughts on his proclamation of the new biggest star? 325k buys is good for the paper thin 170 card, but serious trouble is brewing if that’s the UFC’s “big gun.”

    2013 average was around 470k buys.

    He better open his marketing wallet to get that Bones Jones and Weidman buyrate up.

    Reply
  4. turd master says

    March 1, 2014 at 6:51 am

    leon i agree with you, even more alarming for dana has to be at this moment he does not have one fighter on his roster that can even pull in 500k buys now,

    with gsp gone, anderson is pretty much finished, and the drop in buys for guys like jones, rosey, and velasquez, to many watered down shows, and over priced ppvs are catching up to the ufc.

    Reply
  5. saldathief says

    March 2, 2014 at 5:56 pm

    TRT is juicing! TRT is drug use! TRT is steroid use! If you don’t have enough test retire it means your too old and probably screwed your system up from steroid use in the past Good move NSAC no drugs in sports!

    Reply
  6. Diego says

    March 5, 2014 at 6:34 am

    Do we know how many boxers have TUEs?

    Reply
  7. Jason Cruz says

    March 7, 2014 at 10:08 pm

    @Diego – According to ESPN Outside the Lines article – 0 boxers have sought a TUE in the state of Nevada.

    Reply
  8. mikekoz68 says

    April 19, 2014 at 12:17 am

    What does TUE stand for?

    Reply
    • Jason Cruz says

      April 21, 2014 at 1:39 pm

      Therapeutic Use Exemption

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Diego Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports