• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

FOIA request reveals little information on government investigation of Zuffa

February 7, 2013 by Jason Cruz 3 Comments

Recently, I made a FOIA request to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) inquiring about its investigation of Zuffa with respect to its purchase of Strikeforce.  The documents provided under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) did not reveal anything of note.

The documents consisted of 5 pages. Two pages were form letters, dated January 25, 2012, from the FTC to law firms in the Washington D.C. area (apparently) representing the parties advising that it had closed its investigation.

The letters indicated that the FTC investigated whether the acquisition of Explosion Entertainment, LLC (“Strikeforce”) by Zuffa, LLC violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act or Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

“Upon further review of this matter, it appears that no further action is warranted by the Commission,” read both letters.  The form letters went on to say that the closure of the investigation did not mean that a violation had not been committed…or that one had. It also reserved the right to reopen the investigation if it deemed necessary.  Legal enough for you?

The other three pages were a document entitled “Document Logging Form” which did not reveal anything about facts on the investigation.  It appeared to be a checklist for closing a file.

The FTC cited rules which preclude responsive documents which contain staff analyses, opinions and recommendations.  These are exempt from FOIA.

Payout Perspective:

A little late on getting this information but you didn’t miss much.  The FOIA process was fairly easy and the FTC responded quickly.  Of course, the information that would have been interesting were exempt from FOIA disclosure.  So, the official rendering of the Zuffa investigation by the government is that it had looked into its acquisition of Strikeforce but found no reason to conduct further action into investigating the purchase.

Filed Under: legal, regulation, UFC, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Machiel Van says

    February 7, 2013 at 3:57 pm

    FOIA had a nasty trip to the dentist awhile back. No teeth left to speak of. It used to be really useful for conducting historical research too 🙁

    Reply
    • Jason Cruz says

      February 7, 2013 at 4:06 pm

      MV,

      lol. I actually changed the headline to “little” from “no” information to be accurate. We did get information on how the FTC styles its form letters.

      Reply
  2. barzy says

    February 9, 2013 at 2:15 pm

    I can’t say this is a big suprise. the premise was flawed from the begining. there is ample competition especially with the rise of bellator on spike.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit file statement prior to status conference

Despite two big losses, TKO touts another solid quarter

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Plaintiffs file Answering Brief in Cirkunov Antitrust Appeal

Jai Opetaia files a lawsuit against IBF

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Dude just found a way to beat kids legally

They took him out three batters later

Ryan @RyanF786

THE GREATEST LL MOUND VISIT OF ALL TIME!!

“If you walk the next 5 batters Jesus is still lord,if you strikeout the next 5 batters Jesus is still lord”

🙏🏻 ✝️🙏🏻✝️ #llws #espn #patmcafee

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

"if this mf would have just shook my hand..."

And the Mariners tried to piggy back him

Chris Cochran @bestcoastbias

Castillo with 50% called strike + whiff rate today on his change up. Significant uptick in usage compared to his season totals.

Company line for Mackenzie.

MMA Junkie @MMAJunkie

"Traditional" Mackenzie Dern doesn't share #UFC330 headliner Ian Machado Garry's stance on women running the world.

"I like the man taking the lead."

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports