• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Tyson Nam still under Bellator control

August 31, 2012 by Jason Cruz 4 Comments

Despite a surprise KO victory that should propel his career forward, Tyson Nam is concerned he may be engaged in a legal battle for a shot to continue his career.

Nam’s KO of Bellator Champ Eduardo Dantas received interest from major promotions.  But, Nam is under contract with Bellator and due to his contract, Bellator can match any offer.  However, Nam’s career with Bellator has been non-existent.  Twice he was scheduled to appear in the organization’s tournament but was pulled from each tournament.  Its reported that Bellator will place him in the promotion’s next tournament in 2013.

Nam’s trainer indicates that Bellator will not offer Nam a regular fight on a multi-bout agreement.    He states that Bellator is threatening a lawsuit if Nam accepts a deal with another organization.

Via MMA Junkie:

The dispute stems from a clause in Nam’s contract that gives Bellator matching rights on offers from other promotions 18 months after its expiration. Now that the fighter is a hot commodity, (Phil) Claud (Nam’s trainer) said, it gives Bellator undue leverage in controlling the fighter’s future.

Payout Perspective:

Nam is in an unfortunate situation. When he signed the Bellator deal he probably thought that it would be his big shot.  It was unlikely that he thought about the non-compete/right of first refusal clause in his contract.  For Nam’s counsel, it’s unlikely that this clause would be a deal breaker.  But, Nam’s sudden success seems to have surprised Bellator and it appears that the promotion was not ready for it.

From a public relations perspective, it seems like Bellator could pick up on the momentum of Nam and place him in a non-tournament fight and promote him around his surprising knockout.  Or, Bellator could release Nam if he receives a better offer elsewhere.  Based upon Claud’s description of the situation, it seems like Bellator is holding onto Nam and will not let him out of his contract nor put him on a card.

Filed Under: Bellator, legal

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Matt C. says

    September 1, 2012 at 12:23 am

    Do I have this straight… Bellator signed him to a contract well over a year ago and twice he was pulled from tournaments. So Bellator has never paid him a dime because he has never fought in Bellator and now they want to jack him around because he beat a Bellator fighter outside of Bellator.

    If he signed a contract that still gives Bellator any legal rights after being signed and not getting a fight for a whole year then he needs to get a new manager.

    Reply
  2. Jason Cruz says

    September 2, 2012 at 9:18 pm

    Matt C.

    This appears to be correct. A horrible contract. Honestly, I am not sure if they paid him to sign or compensated him for not placing him in the tourneys but he signed a contract which has a clause that gives Bellator right of first refusal.

    Reply
  3. BrainSmasher says

    September 3, 2012 at 7:01 pm

    You think the UFC would make him a decnet offer just to force Bellator to pay more money. Hell, a 20/20 contract wouldnt throw off the market for the UFC but would assure this kid gets paid and if Bellator doesnt match it they get a much needed guy with a little cread and hype for their small divisions.

    Reply
  4. Machiel Van says

    September 4, 2012 at 7:11 am

    While it seems that Bellator is completely within their legal rights here, there have already been too many legal squabbles between the promotion and their fighters. These situations turn me off to the promotion as a fan, just like it turns me off to Zuffa when they exercise the more oppressive clauses of their contracts.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Matt C. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports