• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Pacquiao-Bradley gate and attendance

June 13, 2012 by Jason Cruz 4 Comments

The attendance and gate figures are in from the Pacquiao-Bradley fight from Saturday night.  ESPN reports the event sold 13,229 tickets for a total gate of $8,963,180 at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas.

There were 925 comps and 2,075 unsold tickets.

NSAC also states that Pac-Bradley earned $249,000 from closed circuit ticket sales according to Dan Rafael of ESPN.

In comparison are some of the numbers from recent Pacquiao/Mayweather fights.

06/09/12 Pacquiao/Bradley – $8,963,180 (13,229 tickets sold)
05/05/12 Mayweather/Cotto – $12,000,150 (14,612 tickets sold)
11/12/12  Pacquiao/Marquez III – $11,648,300 (15,948 tickets sold)
05/07/11  Pacquiao/Mosley – $8,862,000 (15,422 tickets sold)
09/17/11 Mayweather/Ortiz – $9,000,000 (13,364 tickets sold)

Bad Left Hook compares Saturday’s numbers to the 2009 fights with Ricky Hatton ($8,832,50) and Miguel Cotto ($8,847,550).

Payout Perspective:

The numbers pose the question as to whether there should be a rematch November 10th.  This will depend on the PPV numbers although it’s unlikely we’d see Pac-Bradley do more than 1 million buys.  In comparison, Pac-Marquez III did 1.34 million buys and May-Cotto did 1.5 million buys.

Bradley was an unknown commodity going into the fight.  People will know more about him by November which could drum up better numbers.  But, if there is a pending investigation on the judging here, we may not see a rematch.  But, what happens with November 10th.  We presume this would be the next Pacquiao fight.

Does a Marquez fight interest anyone?  We’d be getting a fourth fight in which Pacquiao has already won 2 although both were controversial decisions.  It definitely would bring more of the Mexican and Filipino fans to attend and buy the PPV.  Would it be better than a Bradley rematch?

Filed Under: boxing, gate

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Diego says

    June 14, 2012 at 5:54 am

    Incompetent judging aside there’s no need for a Bradley rematch. Really there was no need for the last few rounds of that fight. It was just rinse and repeat. In November Pacman will again outclass Bradley but struggle to get a KO on a bigger, extremely durable opponent.

    Even a Marquez fight would be rinse and repeat – though much more exciting rinsing and repeating. Those two have fought down to the wire every time and I expect they would do the same again and come to a very close and contentious decision.

    Given the choice, I would not buy a Bradley re-match, but am on the fence about a Marquez re-match.

    I suppose I could be induced to fork over $65 for a Bradley re-match if I felt that Manny had a real fire in him for the fight and was going to be even more aggressive, but Manny has never shown himself to be a trash talker or a guy who gets angry and it will be a tough sell.

    Reply
  2. Machiel Van says

    June 14, 2012 at 9:20 am

    *sigh* For me, this was the straw that finally broke the camel’s back. They’ll never get my money again for a pro-boxing PPV. I’ll still watch, but I won’t be purchasing the PPVs.

    Reply
  3. Diego says

    June 14, 2012 at 10:05 am

    MV,

    I was already limiting myself to only Pacquiao PPVs. After the Ortiz fight I swore off Mayweather PPVs and there are no other PPVs worth the money. I don’t want to punish Pacman for a bad decision but I don’t want to reward Arum either. I’ll wait an see what happens with this before making a decision.

    Reply
  4. Weezy02 says

    June 15, 2012 at 5:11 am

    A rematch will only occur if and when Manny re-ups with Top Rank Promotions for a longer term deal. Otherwise, there will be no rematch and Manny will face someone else in November.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Diego Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Ortiz files motion to confirm injunction over

Congressional Report on Ali Revival Act released

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Bob, he played for the Angels

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

BREAKING: Four-Star RB Jeremy Adeyanju has Committed to Washington, he tells me for @Rivals

The 6’0 215 RB from Phoenix, AZ chose the Huskies over USC, Michigan, and UCLA

“All Glory to God. Blessed to be home. GO DAWGS ☔️”

https://www.on3.com/rivals/jeremy-adeyanju-282401/

I was listening to the Ark-Vandy game in the car and thought I heard the name and then had to check…

Pray for rain

MMA Fighting @MMAFighting

Mailbag: How do we save the UFC White House card? https://www.mmafighting.com/ufc/476379/mailbag-how-do-we-save-the-ufc-white-house-card

#UFC Fight Night 269 Bonus Winners https://mmapayout.com/2026/03/15/ufc-fight-night-269-bonus-winners/

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports