• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Zuffa sues British PPV pirate

October 11, 2010 by Jason Cruz 4 Comments

The Las Vegas Sun (H/t Bloody Elbow) reports that Zuffa filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court of Nevada on Friday against a British man, Daniel Wallace, for illegally streaming UFC PPVs over the internet. The UFC has filed a temporary restraining order prohibiting Wallace’s website, livevss.tv (associated with livevss.net), from streaming this Saturday’s UFC 120.

The Complaint alleges that Wallace operates a web site that illegally streams UFC PPVs for free. Wallace’s site makes a profit through the use of “pop up” ads shown throughout the streaming. Zuffa’s lawsuit (obtained via Pacer) claims that Wallace’s web site illegally streamed UFC 119. As evidence, it attached a screen grab as an exhibit to its Complaint.

Although UFC 120 is free in the United States, it will be available on PPV in Australia.

In conjunction with the lawsuit, Zuffa filed an Emergency Temporary Restraining Order and a Motion for Preliminary Injunction to stop the site from illegally streaming this Saturday’s fight card. It is requesting that the domain name registrar shut down the web site prior to Saturday’s UFC 120.

Payout Perspective:

The complaint and request for injunctive is an example of the crackdown vowed by the UFC against internet piracy of its PPVs. The following may seem familiar, it text is shown prior to UFC PPVs:

Warning: The unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this copyrighted work is illegal. Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by up to 5 years in federal prison and a fine of $250,000.

Although no criminal violations have been filed as suggested from the warning, the legal action reflects Zuffa’s aggressive legal strategy in enforcing its product. This lawsuit suggests that Zuffa is monitoring web sites that illegally show its content and will exercise its right to sue. In this case, Zuffa is requesting statutory damages up to $150,000 as well as legal costs, attorney fees and further monetary damages.

It is understandable that Zuffa is flexing its legal muscle in order to protect its brand as well as making sure that potential internet streamers (and those that may patronize pirate web sites) know that the UFC is monitoring the web. As a result, Zuffa hopes to deter pirated PPVs.

Filed Under: legal, pay-per-view, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Machiel Van says

    October 12, 2010 at 8:55 am

    This is a good strategy by Zuffa. While it will not eliminate this type of piracy from occuring any time soon, it does prove to potential pirates that Zuffa WILL take legal action if they find you.

    Reply
  2. shawn says

    October 13, 2010 at 5:42 am

    Wait so if u watch a ufc on someones website u can get introuble 2 or just the person who puts it up on there website?

    Reply
  3. Machiel Van says

    October 13, 2010 at 7:53 am

    Just the person who posts the videos or owns the webspace on which they are posted.

    Reply
  4. lol says

    October 16, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    you dont get sued immedatley. My site got warnned. Rage-streams.net got warned twice. So yeah. But if you continue then you get sued like rage and other sites

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Opetaia fires back at IBF in opposition to MTD

UFC 331 Payout Perspective

UFC 331 attendance, gate and bonuses

Scott Coker is back with Ki MMA

TKO owns this weekend

Appeals Court sets date for oral argument in Zuffa appeal

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

For the few that are following the William Keane lawsuit against #TopRank #Boxing the Court finally issued an order denying the Motion to Dismiss @DanRafael1 @EzRawBoxing @Boxing_Tribune

Debate between colleagues fail to show any difference via @nwasianweekly

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Do Guardian Caps actually prevent concussions? @ChrisNowinski1 tells @PabloTorre why the story "appears to be a bit of a scam":

"[The NFL's] own published study showed it wasn't true."

"They love that the public sees the Guardian Caps because it's basically virtue-signaling."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

#UFC332 attendance and gate were a serious drop from previous #UFC numbered events at the Delta Center https://mmapayout.com/2026/10/04/ufc-332-attendance/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

A truly mortifying decision.

Beyond disrespectful to generations of Murrow college alumnus. A reprehensible decision motivated purely by greed and a disregard for the integrity of journalism. Damaging the credibility of degrees earned by hard-working and passionate students.

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports