• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Hughes v. Penn III set for UFC 123 in November

September 13, 2010 by Jason Cruz 4 Comments

MMA Fighting’s Ariel Helwani reports that Matt Hughes will face BJ Penn at UFC 123 in Detroit, Michigan.

Penn will move up to welterweight to fight Hughes. Penn’s last fight at 170lbs was a loss to Georges St. Pierre on January 31, 2009.

From MMA Fighting:

Hughes and Penn first fought at UFC 46 in January 2004. In that fight, Penn submitted Hughes with a rear naked choke to win the welterweight title. Hughes had defended the belt five straight times before the loss. They met again at UFC 63. That time, Hughes, again champion, won with a third-round TKO to defend the title.

The scheduled main event at UFC 123 will be Quinton “Rampage” Jackson facing Lyoto Machida.

Payout Perspective:

This matchup is intriguing considering Matt Hughes is on a three fight winning streak and BJ Penn is suffering a two fight skid. Despite their streaks, this fight should garner brand name interest. Hughes, the UFC Hall of Famer, looked sharp in taking out Ricardo Almeida in the first round at UFC 117. Penn on the other hand, is trying to recover from being dominated by Frankie Edgar at UFC 118.  Will a move up to welterweight help Penn against Hughes? If Hughes wins, does this propel him into the welterweight title hunt?

This match bolsters a November PPV which features Rampage Jackson fighting Lyoto Machida.

Filed Under: UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. shawn says

    September 14, 2010 at 2:55 am

    It will do no more than 500kbuys

    Reply
  2. Machiel Van says

    September 14, 2010 at 10:29 am

    With good promotion, yes.

    Reply
  3. Machiel Van says

    September 14, 2010 at 10:29 am

    It will.

    Reply
  4. Diego says

    September 14, 2010 at 10:38 am

    Even if it does “only” 500k buys, for a non-title card that’s a very solid showing. And Quinton, Hughes and BJ all have good name recognition. And I agree with Machiel that it can do more. All three of the aforementioned gentlemen have been known to do some pre-fight trash-talking to hype an event.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Government response to citizen lawsuit attempting to stop UFC White House

Lawsuit seeks to shutdown UFC White House event

Johnson plaintiffs take a renewed aim at Dominance in antitrust lawsuit

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

From the Judge's Order today denying the injunction. The Court states that plaintiffs did not have a specific harm to satisfy the threshold for an injunction #UFCWhiteHouse #TKO #UFC

Judge Amit Mehta, the judge that denied the #UFC White House injunction, was a Obama appointee. Just another reason to Blame Obama

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Only 16% of Americans approve of Trump holding UFC event at White House.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ALERT: Judge Amit Metha rules UFC event can proceed at White House, ruling harm to plaintiffs would only be "temporary" & that the challenge came too late

"Considerable time, labor & funding.. has gone into organizing the UFC fight and lead-up events"

Full contact 5 days a week 😂

MMA Mania @mmamania

Mania Mailbag: Do we trane UFC? https://www.mmamania.com/mma-mailbag-questions-answers-ufc/449583/mania-mailbag-do-we-trane-ufc?utm_campaign=dhtwitter&utm_content=%3Cmedia_url%3E&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports