• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Silva, Evans Sign with MusclePharm

July 23, 2010 by Kelsey Philpott 6 Comments

Musclepharm has reached multi-fight sponsorship agreements with two of the UFC’s biggest stars in Anderson Silva and Rashad Evans. The company made the announcement at the end of June.

MusclePharm(R) Corporation (OTCBB:MSLP – News), a fast-growing nutritional supplement company with a proprietary formulation used in eight performance products, is pleased to announce multi-fight sponsorship deals with two of the biggest stars in the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), middleweight champion Anderson Silva and former light heavyweight champion and No. 1 contender Rashad Evans.

Payout Perspective:

This isn’t terribly shocking: Anderson Silva was sponsored by Musclepharm at UFC 112 and Rashad Evans has been sponsored by Musclepharm since at least UFC 108 (the company has a deal with Greg Jackson’s Gym and sponsors many of the Jackson fighters on a fight-to-fight basis).

There’s long been a debate in sponsorship circles as to whether the actions of a sponsored property can negatively impact a sponsoring brand. Multiple studies have been performed regarding the topic, but none paint a stunningly clear picture. In fact, most suggest that it really depends on context: things such as pre-existing brand awareness, loyalty, consumer expectations, etc.

Sometimes I wonder what the impact of Anderson Silva’s performance at UFC 112 had on the Musclepharm brand. I can’t imagine it was severe. Yet just the same as the brand can be associated with a strong performance, I tend to think the brand may have been slightly impacted by Silva’s negative performance at 112: a less-than-entertained crowd had to suffer through the world’s best fighter dancing around for the better part of 30 minutes and the entire time that MP logo was stuck smack dab in the middle of it all.

Still, I don’t think it takes away much from the great work that Musclepharm has been doing to promote its brand and activate around that WEC partnership.

Filed Under: sponsorships, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Machiel Van says

    July 23, 2010 at 8:32 am

    Hmmm… interesting subject. I completely forgot that Anderson Silva was sponsored by Musclepharm at UFC 112. I consider myself a pretty hardcore fan, so the fact that I completely forgot may be indicative in this regard. However, I will also admit that I don’t pay much attention to fighter sponsorships other than what I read on this site, and I don’t use any sort of supplements (unless you count 1 A Day vitamins and flax oil lol). I guess for me my brain didn’t make the Anderson Silva/Musclepharm connection, so maybe only had a short term effect (I probably would’ve remembered the logo for a short time after I watched the event.) Anyone else have a different experience?

    Reply
  2. Diego says

    July 23, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    Machiel,

    A lot of product placement works subliminally. Few people can recall exactly where they saw a certain logo, but they do remember the product and they have a certain (almost emotional) perception of the brand.

    It’s not surprising that someone watching UFC 112 would not remember months later that A. Silva was sponsored by Musclepharm, but I’m willing to bet that the placement did raise your awareness of the brand and left you with a certain perception of that brand. However, brand awareness takes thousands of “views” to be established, so you would be hard pressed to identify how Silva’s performance makes you feel about Musclepharm because your perception is muddled with all of the different times you’ve seen the brand.

    All of that makes it very difficult for companies to figure out if they are getting the bang for their buck. It’s tricky stuff and edging ever closer to psychology, but I doubt it will ever fully be understood. Like John Wanamaker used to say, ““I know that half of my advertising dollars are wasted … I just don’t know which half.” As long as they keep sponsoring MMA, I don’t care which half.

    Reply
  3. Machiel Van says

    July 23, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    Thanks Diego. Influence on consumer behavior is fascinating, and I do admit if I ever did feel inclined to go and buy supplements, I might be enticed by certain brands simply because I have seen them displayed in MMA (however I would do some heavy research, but I suspect that for a lot of people the brand recognition might be enough).

    Reply
  4. Kelsey Philpott says

    July 23, 2010 at 4:44 pm

    Diego,

    You’re absolutely right. The technical term is iconic rote learning; essentially you know something, but can’t remember how or where you’ve learned that something. It comes from the repeated exposure to a certain message over an extended period of time.

    The notion that people will eventually learn something if given enough exposure places an even greater importance on 360 degree (integrated) marketing. It’s not just that you want to cover all your bases and reach as many people as possible, but you also want to deliver that message to each individual as many times and in as many ways as possible.

    Machial,

    I’ve always advocated that the MMA fan can play a role in the growth/development of the sport beyond simply attending events and purchasing PPVs. If every single UFC fan made their beer of choice Bud Light or bought a USA Today subscription or visited Burger King every time they went to grab Fast Food, that would make a difference. There’s no tangible way to link that back to the UFC, but the principle of supporting those that support MMA is self explanatory.

    Interesting discussion guys…

    Reply
  5. Bill says

    July 26, 2010 at 10:09 am

    Is Anderson Silva still signed with Nutrabolics? If he is, I would think that signing with ANOTHER supplement company (and one of Nutrabolics competitors) would be a conflict of interest..

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Tweets that mention Silva, Evans Sign with MusclePharm : MMAPayout.com: The Business of MMA -- Topsy.com says:
    July 23, 2010 at 10:27 am

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tommy Rowlands, mma.ly. mma.ly said: Silva, Evans Sign with MusclePharm http://bit.ly/dvPMdE (MMA Payout) #fb […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports