• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

UFC 104 Prelims on Spike Draw 1.4 Million

October 27, 2009 by Kelsey Philpott 1 Comment

MMAPayout.com has confirmed that the UFC 104 Prelims on Spike TV drew a 1.1 household rating for an average audience of 1.4 million viewers. The show also generated a 1.3 rating in both the M18-34 and M18-49 demographics.

The prelims ended up being the second ranked fight card in the M18-34 demo on Saturday night television, behind college football on ESPN.

Payout Perspective:

The ratings for the prelim show remain more or less unchanged from last time out: UFC 103 drew a 1.0 for somewhere around a 1.5 million audience average.

Last time out, it was thought that a lack of promotion time and the Mayweather-Marquez fight had impacted the viewership, but that appears not to be the case. More realistically, the market and appetite for these prelim shows looks to be fairly static – the same core UFC fan base tunes in every time to watch.

While it’s not clear whether these events help to drive viewers to the PPV, they’re still beneficial in helping to develop talent in front of a larger audience. In a day where the UFC is scrambling to find headline-worthy talent, the more exposure their up-and-coming fighters get, the better.

Filed Under: ratings, TV, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Peter Griffith says

    October 27, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    “While it’s not clear whether these events help to drive viewers to the PPV, they’re still beneficial in helping to develop talent in front of a larger audience. In a day where the UFC is scrambling to find headline-worthy talent, the more exposure their up-and-coming fighters get, the better.”

    I agree.

    For me, that also brings to mind the issue of the UFC having the giant roster and not enough shows to keep all fighters active. But that’s a different discussion. 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Peter Griffith Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports