• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

No Need to Panic

July 16, 2008 by Kelsey Philpott Leave a Comment

By now most of the MMA world has probably heard about Rampage Jackson’s arrest yesterday afternoon in Newport Beach, California. It was certainly a shock to many, but as troubling as his predicament may seem, I would encourage everyone not to jump to conclusions, nor to pass judgement.

When an MMA fighter finds himself in trouble with the law, the immediate reaction of just about everyone in the community is to ask “how badly will this hurt MMA?”

Truth be told, Rampage’s incident won’t. Not really.

If anything the instinctive reflex of the MMA community to hold its breath and brace for a media ass whooping is probably more of a problem than the “bad” publicity that stems from one of these incidents.

The promoters, fighters, media, and fans alike must show more confidence in their sport and stop walking on egg shells. After all, how can the MMA community expect anyone else to believe in the sport if the community is constantly second-guessing itself.

These fighters are human, they’re going to make mistakes, and they will be held accountable for their actions. However, a case of hit and run is not going to send MMA back to the dark ages; forcing deregulation or negatively impacting buy-rates and merchandise purchases.

If Mark Ratner’s latest interview with the TriStateFighter.com is any indication, the UFC and MMA have a long way to go in educating lawmakers about the sport. The fact that Rampage got into trouble isn’t going to do any more damage in the eyes of those that still believe MMA is a sport without officials or one that fights to the death.

Furthermore, consider that the UFC’s core demographic is males aged 18-34. Ask yourself how many of them are truly bothered by this or any other run-in with the law that involves an MMA fighter.

The only negative from this incident that I truly see impacting the sport is the insecurity shown by the MMA community. The potential loss of Rampage Jackson – a superb fighter with a truly marketable personality – might also be a negative, but as I said…we should reserve judgement.

Want some additional food for thought? With arguably the best heavyweight card ever assembled set for PPV and the world’s “Pound-for-Pound King” ready to air, free, on SpikeTV this Saturday night, yesterday’s events could give new meaning to “no publicity is bad publicity.”

Filed Under: Affliction, legal, media, opinion and analysis, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed https://mmapayout.com/2026/05/11/ufc-freedom-250-kits-revealed/

Unpopular opinion: Kevin Harlan just yells #NBA #Lakers #FOKC

Marcus Smart with a play #Lakers

The guy sold the team to OKC claiming they’d build something in Seattle

Wall Street Journal Opinion @WSJopinion

Seattle turns hostile to the great businesses it made. Starbucks is moving jobs from Washington state to Tennessee, and it isn’t alone in looking elsewhere, writes @HowardSchultz
https://on.wsj.com/4uCiVCD

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

How did Loeffler/360 Promotions rebuild interest in Bohachuk after he lost to Adams the first time?
Why does any promoter, if they still have the rights to the fighter, continue their agreement after a loss?
An attorney and former boxing manager's thoughts (archived):

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports