• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Undertones of MMA: Sport or Lifestyle?

June 14, 2008 by Staff Leave a Comment

On its best nights, the recipe for great MMA was real simple: equal parts pro-wrestling and boxing. The pageantry of the former, combined with the legitimacy and unscripted nature of the latter were thought to make for an intoxicating night of fights.

However, Tuesday’s dichotic announcements are an indication that since its assumed all MMA promotions are based in legitimate, unscripted competition, the pageantry associated with pro-wrestling is more important for attracting fans and drawing revenue.

But the bottom-line is that the UFC is the only promotion that has found the balance between too much and too little pomp in the circumstance of MMA.

After all, when EliteXC’s CBS telecast juxtaposed MMA with grand entrances, brash hip-hop artists and MMA’s version of the Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders, it was not only rejected by fans, but by the MMA media as well.

Smaller promotions, like many that appear on HDNet, leave their production in the hands of the network, which does an adequate job, but does not devote the resources on a level equivalent to the UFC, or its cable television partner SpikeTV.

In fact, the UFC owes the majority of its financial success to SpikeTV. Outside of turning the promotion around after launching the Ultimate Fighter reality series, SpikeTV’s pay per view previews give the UFC something no other promotion has: A platform on which to sell, not just the sport, but the lifestyle of mixed martial arts.

Early indicators from Afflication’s pre-show production and promos are that it will be on par, and possibly exceed the UFC’s presentation.

If they find a content partner that allows them to sell their brand and its fighters as a lifestyle, it will quickly become a force to be reckoned with, despite the fact that the initial pay per view is doomed to be a profitless endeavor.

The addition of Donald Trump as one of the organizations backers not only gives Affliction deep pockets, but connections to NBC and the king of reality TV producers, Mark Burnett, who cooked up Trump’s reality show, “The Apprentice.”

Given Affliction’s dual role as an MMA promotion and clothing company, it already has created a context for a lifestyle. Finding that “lifestyle content” partner would drive consumers to its MMA product and clothing line at the same time.

Filed Under: Affliction, IFL, opinion and analysis, pro wrestling, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

IBF seeks to stay discovery in Opetaia lawsuit

TKO announce Q3 earnings

UFC 333 bonuses

FBI seeking no-bid contract with the UFC

Court denies Top Rank’s Motion to Dismiss in Keane case

Opetaia fires back at IBF in opposition to MTD

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Dan Hicks’ call of the Michael Phelps-Jason Lezak relay from the 2008 Olympics will long live as one of the greatest ever.

Rest in peace to a legend.

Who let the dogs out!!!!

Murray Hill Guy @MurrayHillGuy1

This man has more range than Steph Curry in 2016…

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Here's a look at one of Rashee Rice's recent pay stubs from the Kansas City Chiefs (via his bankruptcy filing).

$43,353 in weekly earnings
- $19,570 for taxes/SS/Medicare
- $9,117 for garnishments, union dues, and fines
————
= $14,665 in take-home pay

As of October 25, Rice has

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports