Warrant issued for Jones for hit and run

April 27, 2015

An arrest warrant has been issued for UFC Light Heavyweight Champion Jon Jones as a result of a hit and run incident that occurred on Sunday in Albuquerque, New Mexico.  The charge indicates that Jones left the scene of an accident involving “death or personal injuries.”  There was not a death, but in the three car accident, a pregnant woman suffered injuries to her arm and wrist.

UPDATED:  Jones in custody.

According to the warrant, an off-duty police officer recognized Jon Jones at the scene as he watches UFC “all the time.”  The off-duty officer was in the area at the time of the accident.  He observed Jones at the driver’s door area of a silver Buick.  Jones was identified as the driver of the Buick.  Another witness at the scene observed Jones leaving the vehicle and then returning as he put cash in his pants from the Buick.

MMA Fighting reports that Jones will turn himself in.  The MMA Fighting article indicates a pipe with marijuana was inside the car Jones was apparently driving.

Jon Jones Warrant

Payout Perspective:

Based on the information at hand, the pregnant woman that was injured does not appear to have life threatening injuries or injuries that might affect the birth of her child.  Of course, that’s based on information we know at this time and this could change.  Hopefully not.  Notwithstanding that issue, the news of the latest trouble for Jon Jones is of huge concern for the UFC.  The UFC will come under fire for whatever decision it may make with respect to his fight next month.  From one perspective, if they keep him on the card while the investigation goes on there will be criticism.  If he is taken off at this point, it hurts the card and the UFC business.  We will see what happens to Jones in the coming days.

Jon Jones sought by New Mexico police for hit and run incident

April 26, 2015

MMA Fighting is reporting that UFC Light Heavyweight Champion Jon Jones is being sought by Albuquerque Police in connection with a hit and run accident that occurred Saturday night.

A police spokesperson for Albuquerque’s police department indicated that Jones is being sought in connection with a woman’s car being struck Sunday morning by another car with the other vehicle leaving the scene.

Despite previous reports Sunday, Jones was not detained by the police nor is a warrant out for his arrest.  Furthermore, it does not appear whether Jones was the driver of the car the fled and whether he is in any way culpable for the hit and run.

Payout Perspective:

What might be just a misunderstanding and a non-issue blew up the MMA twittersphere with rumors running abound that Jones was off of May’s UFC 187 card as well as other speculative information.  Of course, the police have yet to question Jones.  A lot of the conjecture is based on Jones’ prior history which includes a DUI and a one night stint in a drug rehab facility for admitting to cocaine use.  One would hope for all involved, that Jones’ latest incident is a simple car accident.  If there is more to the issue, it could lead to another public relations issue in the weeks to come.

UFC manager comments on Reebok deal, fight management

April 22, 2015

In light of Zuffa’s announcement that it has changed the policy through which it will compensate fighters under the Reebok sponsorship deal, a manager of UFC fighters has spoken out about the deal and the sponsorship landscape.  Oren Hodak of KO Reps who represents Johny Hendricks, Ovince St. Pierre and Joe Lauzon among others has expressed his opinion on the problems with the current state of MMA sponsorship.

“The current problem in the MMA landscape is the managers/agents that are in the business.  They aren’t working hard enough or smart enough going after non endemic brands.  They are simply seeing a logo on another fighter and then contacting that company. Or even more pathetic is agents calling another agent to help them out with a deal,”  Hodak told MMA Payout.  Hodak holds a Master’s degree in Sports Marketing and worked in the sports industry for several years before opening up his MMA management company.

“KOreps has had great success giving companies such as Reebok, Bass Pro, Smart Stop Self Storage, Instaloans and most recently Parts-express.com their first real taste of Octagon exposure in addition to partnering with fighters outside of the cage,” stated Hodak.  “Sure, the sponsor tax takes money out of budgets from your core MMA clothing and supplement companies but there are plenty more companies out there with a sports marketing budget.  Over the years the UFC has slowly raised the sponsor tax and added numerous categories to the non-approved list, giving fighters less and less opportunity. In turn, managers have an excuse as to why they aren’t producing and UFC has fighters openly complaining about sponsorship money.”

On Monday, the Sports Business Journal reported that the UFC had changed the way it would pay its fighters through the Reebok sponsorship deal which goes into effect in July.  Instead of relying on media rankings, it would base the sponsorship pay on the number of fights an individual has had under Zuffa.  This would include fights in Strikeforce and WEC after both were acquired by Zuffa.  The change in the policy was said to be based on speaking with a number of fighters and managers.

“Some fighters may come out ahead with this new deal but I believe the fighters with professionally qualified sports management behind them will not,” Hodak added, “We have already heard from numerous fighters losing deals because they can’t utilize the valuable fight night impressions surrounding tv viewership.”

Payout Perspective:

It’s clear that despite the change in payment structure, the UFC-Reebok deal will still affect the bottom line of many fighters.  Hodak points out an issue he sees as a manager of fighters.  It’s an interesting viewpoint and a constructive critique on the nature of the business.  It also calls into question the management practice of some in the industry.  Not only will the sponsorship landscape change in the UFC, but the management of fighters may change too.  We shall see how this plays out in the UFC after the Reebok deal is put into place this summer.

Injunction overturned, Rampage back on UFC 186 card

April 21, 2015

In a surprising turn of events, the New Jersey court that issued the preliminary injunction preventing Rampage Jackson from fighting on Saturday’s UFC 186 card has reversed its decision. At this point, no court records have surfaced but Bellator has issued a statement indicating that it is “disappointed (the court) reversed the injunction as to the April 25 fight.

Jackson released his own announcement via social media:

Payout Perspective:

One can only guess the reasons for the Court to reverse its decision at this point. In its opinion issued on April 7th, it appeared that the Court seemed dead set that Rampage had breached his contract. Unless there was a procedural defect, the Court must have been persuaded by another issue it overlooked to reverse its opinion.  MMA Payout will have more as the information becomes available.

UPDATED: Not surprising, the UFC is pleased with Tuesday’s ruling overturning the preliminary injunction.  “We are happy with the decision from the New Jersey Court allowing Rampage to fight in Montreal this Saturday night,” UFC President Dana White said, “I am looking forward to seeing Rampage back in the Octagon.”

Show Money Episode 3 talks Rampage, Antitrust and Phil Davis

April 21, 2015

The third episode of Show Money talks Rampage injunction, an update on the UFC Antitrust lawsuit, Phil Davis to Bellator and the dismissal of Zuffa’s lawsuit in New York. I join Bloody Elbow’s Paul Gift and John Nash to talk, debate and discuss these issues.

UFC to change Reebok pay structure to tiered system

April 20, 2015

Sports Business Journal reports (subscription recommended) that the UFC is making a change to the way it will compensate its fighters through the Reebok deal.  Instead of paying fighters based on media rankings, it will pay fighters based on a “tiered system” based on tenure or number of UFC bouts fought.

There will be 5 tiers based on the number of fights an individual has had with the UFC.  The article indicates that the UFC will count fights with the WEC and Strikeforce into the number of fights an individual has fought with the organization. There will be tiers of 1-5 fights, 6-10 fights, 11-15 fights, 16-20 fights and more than 21 fights according to the article.

Title fights will be an exception to this rule as the fighters will receive greater compensation.  The UFC declined comment on sharing the amount of money each tier would receive.

The change is based on speaking with fighters and managers about the new Reebok deal according to UFC senior vice president of global consumer products, Tracey Bleczinksi.

The article includes quotes from Glenn Robinson of Authentic Sports Management and Ronda Rousey’s manager Brad Slater.  Robinson indicated that the sponsorship money has dried up over the years and that the Reebok deal is “more sustainable.”  Slater acknowledged that despite the number of sponsors a fighter may have, the total money earned was not “a really significant number.”

Payout Perspective:

The new “tiered” system appears to be a much more fair system than the media rankings which were widely criticized.  The system which rewards a fighter based on time served in the UFC (or WEC or Strikeforce) is a much more stable way of determining how a fighter will be compensated through the Reebok deal.  It also gives a fighter incentive to do their best to stay in the UFC.  Still, the unknown is how much a fighter will be paid through the deal.  The UFC does leave itself an out as the policy allows it to pay fighters more in championship bouts (e.g. McGregor at UFC 189).

The article points out that the change was based on discussions with fighters and their managers about the deal.  It’s interesting that these discussions happened now and not during the time prior to the Reebok announcement.  The new change should give a fighter more certainty as to what tier they are in and an expectancy as to how much they should receive from Reebok.

UFC on Fox 15 draws 2.43 million viewers in overnight ratings

April 19, 2015

Televison By Numbers reports that the UFC on Fox 15 event on Fox Saturday night drew an average of 2.43 million viewers which narrowly edged out the New York Rangers-Pittsburgh Penguins NHL game on NBC.

UFC on Fox 15 scored 2.43 million viewers, a 0.9 rating among the 18-49 demo and a 4 share.  The event ran from 8:00pm-10:00pm.  There was little, if any overrun as Luke Rockhold stopped Lyoto Machida in the main event.  The NHL on NBC (8:00pm-11:00pm) drew similar ratings with 2.41 million viewers, a similar 0.9 rating in the 18-49 category and a 3 share.

The UFC event was also up against the NBA Playoffs which aired on cable.

UFC on Fox 11 event which aired about the same time last year drew an initial overnight rating of 1.99 million viewers and was adjusted up to 2.5 million viewers.

In terms of overall viewership for the night, TV By Numbers is reporting that 48 Hours on CBS drew 6.25 million viewers in the 10pm slot Saturday

UFC on Fox 15 ratings

Payout Perspective:

This is a very good rating for the UFC considering it went up against the NHL Playoffs.  While it’s only the first round, one would think that the New York-Pittsburgh matchup would draw considerable interest from the two of the biggest television markets.  MMA Payout will have more on the ratings as they come in.

 UFC on Fox Ratings
UFC on Fox 1 5,700,000
UFC on Fox 2 4,570,000
UFC on Fox 3 2,250,000
UFC on Fox 4 2,360,000
UFC on Fox 5 3,410,000
UFC on Fox 6 4,220,000
UFC on Fox 7 3,300,000
UFC on Fox 8 2,380,000
UFC on Fox 9 2,800,000
UFC on Fox 10 3,220,000
UFC on Fox 11 1,980,000
UFC on Fox 12 2,500,000
UFC on Fox 13 2,800,000
UFC on Fox 14 2,820,000
UFC on Fox 15 2,430,000

UPDATED: PBC on NBC averages 2.9 million viewers

April 13, 2015

The adjusted viewership for Saturday night’s PBC primetime telecast on NBC drew 2.9 million viewers. The show peaked with 3.4 million viewers.

The ratings reflect a 15% drop from its debut in March which drew an average of 3.4 million peaking at 4.2 million.

NBC Sports PR tweeted out further info:

More information on the ratings can be found in our initial post.

Payout Perspective:

It’s clear from the numbers that the second network telecast of Al Haymon’s PBC did not do as well as the debut.  The show’s peak this time around was the average viewership for the debut.  What is interesting is the positive spin in coverage of these boxing ratings as opposed to what you might read from MMA ratings.  The last NBC Sports tweet is indicative of the positive view on the ratings.  While we might conclude that boxing will do well in the 18-49 category, the 190% seems overblown as to the actual amount of difference.  Moreover, it does not factor in the amount expended in the marketing and promotion of PFC versus those afternoon boxing telecasts.  Regardless, the viewership is good for the sport no matter how you want to view it.

PBC on NBC draws 2.62 million viewers, down from network debut

April 12, 2015

The second event for Premier Boxing Champions on NBC network television drew 2.62 million viewers in Live + Same Day ratings according to Television By Numbers.  It also drew a 0.7 rating in the 18-49 demo and 3 share for its 8:30pm-11:00pm airing.

The ratings are down from its debut in March of 3.13 million viewers in fast overnights and the adjusted viewership of 3.4 million.  We might expect an adjustment of the 2.62 million but it likely won’t exceed the PBC debut on NBC.

PBC featured Danny Garcia defeating Lamont Peterson and an entertaining opener on the show with Andy Lee and Peter Quillin fighting to a draw.  The Lee-Quillin fight was the more exciting of the two as Lee fought back from two knockdowns to score one of his own and getting a draw.

NASCAR Sprint Cup on Fox outdrew PBC Boxing with its 2 hour showing on the network from 8-10pm.  It drew 4.65 million viewers with a 0.9 rating and 4 share.

In the quarter hours TV By Numbers breaks down PBC’s ratings:

8:30-9:00 – 0.7 rating, 3 share, 2.62 million

9:00-9:30 – 0.7 rating, 3 share, 2.62 million

9:30-10:00 –0.7 rating, 3 share, 2.80 million

10:00-10:30 – 0.9 rating, 3 share, 2.97 million

10:30-11:00 – 0.9 rating, 3 share, 3.07 million

Payout Perspective:

PBC went up against the NCAA College Hockey Championship Game on ESPN and NASCAR on Fox.  Also of note, in the 10:00-11:00 hour, 48 Hours on CBS outdrew PBC in total viewers 5.07M to 3.07M.  Despite not doing as well as its debut, the production of the show was well done.  It’s clear it’s a big investment when Bob Costas is on the show.  We will see if viewership picks up over time.  Certainly, Haymon, et al are prepared to stick it out with its investment.

Plaintiffs in Zuffa antitrust case file opposition to motion to transfer venue

April 11, 2015

The Plaintiffs in the Le v. Zuffa, LLC (and related) antitrust case(s) have filed its opposition to Zuffa’s Motion to Transfer Venue to Las Vegas.  Its main argument is that the forum selection clauses in the plaintiffs fight contracts are inapplicable in this antitrust action.

Earlier this year, Zuffa filed a motion to transfer venue from the federal court in San Jose to the federal court in Las Vegas citing, among the issues, the contractual agreements signed by the fighters.  Also, it argued that many of the witnesses are residing in Vegas thus it would be more convenient for this litigation to occur in Las Vegas.

On Friday, Plaintiffs filed opposition to the motion which states that the forum selection clauses (the contractual language in the fight contracts binding fighters to bring legal action in Vegas) are not applicable in this antitrust matter.  It argues that the contractual language only related to issues “to interpret or enforce” the contracts and Plaintiffs argue that the contracts are only relevant to the effect that the UFC used them as part of its anticompetitive scheme.  The Plaintiffs go on to state in its pleadings that the UFC “torture the text of the Agreements and ignore the weight of authority that defeats its Motion.”  Essentially, the UFC misinterprets its own contracts in this matter.

UFC has issued its own statement in relation to the opposition filed Friday:

“As expected, the plaintiffs have filed their opposition to our motion to dismiss. Nothing in their opposition changes our view that their complaints are filled with conclusory allegations that are not adequate to support their antitrust claim. As we laid out in our motion to dismiss, UFC has competed in a lawful manner that has benefited fighters and built UFC into a premier organization in the sport of Mixed Martial Arts.

Indeed, UFC properly competes with other MMA promoters, fairly compensates its athletes and has created a product that is enjoyed by millions of fans around the world. Our legal position is solid and we intend to prevail in this lawsuit.”

The hearing date on the motion to transfer venue is set for May 7th.

In addition to this motion, Zuffa has filed a motion to dismiss with the opposition brief pending.

Payout Perspective:

MMA Payout will keep you posted on this motion.  Plaintiffs argue several other points in its opposition which will cover in the coming days.  Essentially, the Plaintiffs argue that despite the fighters signing their fight contracts which subject them to jurisdiction in Las Vegas, the headquarters of the UFC, the claims that they bring do not relate to the enforcement of the contract.  The contract is only evidence of the anticompetitive nature of the organization.  In addition, Plaintiffs argue that key individuals do reside in San Jose and thus it should stay in the district.  Also, they claim that based on median time of filing to trial, it is faster (25%) to trial in San Jose than Las Vegas.

« Previous PageNext Page »