• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Zuffa retains Boies Schiller & Flexner

December 30, 2014 by Jason Cruz 2 Comments

The UFC issued a statement in which it announced that it has retained the law firm of Boies, Schiller & Flexner to defend it against plaintiffs seeking class action status alleging Zuffa of violating antitrust laws.

Per the UFC web site:

We have built a popular business from modest beginnings by meeting the needs of fans and fighters. Millions of people have watched our bouts, we have instituted leading health and safety measures for our athletes, and fighters are free to negotiate contract terms.

We will stand up against the plaintiffs in this litigation every step of the way, and have engaged attorneys from Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP with a depth of experience in antitrust issues.

Bill Isaacson, our lead litigator, says, “The antitrust laws have long favored companies that create new products and services that consumers want. That is exactly what the UFC has done here through its long and substantial investment in building a popular sport.”

We are proud of the company we have built, confident in our legal position, and intend to prevail in this lawsuit.

Payout Perspective:

Boies, Schiller & Flexner is a high profile firm as some may recognize the last name Boies as David Boies from Bush v. Gore (Boies represented Gore) fame.  Lead counsel appears to be Bill Isaacson, a partner with the firm.  According to his bio, he provided key cross-examination (according to me the hardest thing to do in litigation) of NCAA witnesses in the 2014 case of O’Bannon v. NCAA.  Isaacson, who was one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs, prevailed on behalf of O’Bannon.  With the retention of its attorneys, it will be an interesting and hotly contested matter.  Stay tuned in 2015.

Filed Under: Antitrust Class Action, Featured, legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. jjjjjj_ffffff says

    December 31, 2014 at 10:02 am

    if the UFC fights were as hotly contested as the lawsuits, Zuffa ratings and PPV numbers would be through the roof

    Reply
  2. tops E says

    December 31, 2014 at 1:00 pm

    Hahahaha…the ” humble” PR by the ufc….would be effective if dw was not a dictator all these years and aggressive in bashing fighters now it really looks pathetic….dw is afraid hahahaha…..from modest beginnings?maybe seg times….but zuffa spending huge sums at the start is not modest at all hahahahahahahahaha pathetic

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

#UFC 328 attendance, gate and bonuses https://mmapayout.com/2026/05/10/ufc-328-attendance-gate-and-bonuses/

As I recall, Silva almost put a hole in James Irvin's face

Jed I. Goodman © @jedigoodman

UFC once put the 🐐 Anderson Silva in a non-title LHW fight on Spike TV just to compete with Affliction’s PPV.

The old Dana would absolutely do something like this: tell fans to tune in to UFC Vegas 117 for the International Fight Week card announcement, then stage the

#ZuffaBoxing tonight?

Just pay for his insurance

Dovy🔌 @DovySimuMMA

🫡Dana White CONFIRMS he’s signed Jim Miller to another 5 fight deal

via @ufc

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports