• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Plaintiffs spar with Zuffa over discovery in Antitrust lawsuit

April 1, 2026 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Remember when Dana White testified that he has nothing to do with matchmaking? The texts and other messages from the UFC were to be sent to plaintiffs in the ongoing lawsuit in the Kajan Johnson antitrust case. However, they were not sent on time argues the plaintiffs.

According to plaintiffs, Zuffa did not have the correct date to produce documents. It was only after a filing for Motion to Compel (i.e., Motion for an order to show cause…) did Zuffa provide docuements.

Plaintiffs had filed a Motion to Compel the Production of Documents but withdrew it after documents were produced. The emails between the attorneys reflect the disagreement as to when production of documents were due.

Below is attorney for Zuffa, Joseph Axelrad sending plaintiffs’ attorneys an email on Saturday night stating that production of documents would not get to plaintiffs until March 23rd.

In this follow-up email plaintiffs’ attorney responds to Zuffa’s attorney and points out that the above email would not be needed if they believe that the production would be due on Monday, March 23rd.

Zuffa has not responded to this latest legal pleadings. According to the filing by plaintiffs, they will be filing a motion citing non-compliance with the Court Order as well as requesting attorney fees for having to bring a motion to the court.

Notably, in most discovery cases, if a due date falls on a weekend day, the party has until the next court day to file a response and it would still be in compliance. Hence, here it would seem that if the due date was a Saturday, they would have until Monday to respond.

However, this might not be the case here as a Saturday night email from Zuffa’s attorney may suggest (as plaintiffs’ argue) that they knew that a hard deadline occurred on Saturday night.

Regardless, plaintiffs have withdrawn its Motion to Compel but they argue that they have not had a chance to determine the completeness of the discovery responses. Plaintiffs want to make sure that the document production complies with the Court Order and if not, they may take it to the Court.

MPO will continue to follow.

Filed Under: Antitrust Class Action, Dana White, Johnson, legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Johnson plaintiffs take a renewed aim at Dominance in antitrust lawsuit

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Conor McGregor returns July 11th

Keane’s attorneys fire back at Top Rank based on undiscovered evidence

White writes letter to Trump requesting change to law

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Yes! Photo is the first proof of Trump at a UFC UFC 32: Showdown in the Meadowlands. June 29, 2001

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Welcome to the first 9 pm sunset of the year!

From now through July 18, the sun won’t dip below the horizon until the 9 o’clock hour. ☀️

TIME reports that White was instrumental in getting the young male vote for Trump. But White says the White House fight card is non-political. OK

We need more of this in MMA but also why was this show in Russia never seen in America?

FULL SEND MMA @full_send_mma

Daniel Cormier admits he shut down Jon Jones when he tried to be friendly with him while filming their reality show

“One morning he walked up to me and said D … good morning. I said nahhh that will never happen, don’t call me D”

WHERE IS THE POLYMARKET IN WHICH WE CAN BUY A CONTRACT TO SEE IF TRUMP WILL ACTUALLY SHOW UP TO #UFC FIGHT NIGHT WHITE HOUSE

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports