• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Judge Boulware issues order Zuffa will not be happy with in Johnson antitrust case

January 27, 2026 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Judge Richard Boulware issued a Supplemental Order on Tuesday in response to Zuffa’s attempt to stay a discovery order issued on January 6th.

As a result, Judge Boulware gave a detailed accounting of the discovery issues. This includes calling out Zuffa for an “unfortunate pattern of obfuscation and discovery violations.”

Judge Boulware also noted that Zuffa had “consistently violated its device disclosure order by failing to provide “specific and detailed” device information for all relevant custodians.” Thus, Zuffa was supposed to list all of the relevant employees (and/or people under its control) that had cell phones, computers, laptops, iPads, etc. and turn over information on them. According to Boulware’s order, it has not.

The February 4th and 5th hearings which will include Dana White to testify in person will go forward. Despite the fact that Zuffa has brought up the issue that there may be attorney/client privilege issues, Judge Boulware indicates it had brought up the issue to Defense Counsel, but, according to the Court, “Defense Counsel demurred.”

Judge Boulware 0127 Supp Order by MMA Payout

Payout Perspective:

You can infer from the tone that Judge Boulware was not a fan of Zuffa going to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in attempt to stay his order. In his viewpoint, he believes defendants have had ample time to produce the discovery he has allowed and has a past history of discovery violations. As a result, he is not cutting any slack here. In fact, he makes it clear on the record that defendants have not identified its position. This makes the attorneys look bad and Judge Boulware knows it. Thus, Dana White will appear in court to testify and while he can be coached up to do it, its going to take a lot of time and money to ensure he does a good job.

Filed Under: Antitrust Class Action, Dana White, Discovery, Featured, Johnson, legal, UFC, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC 330 Payout Perspective

Update on CSI Entertainment – Mayweather lawsuit, Injunction request withdrawn

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit file statement prior to status conference

Despite two big losses, TKO touts another solid quarter

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

If I could I’d pay Rafe to write about MMA from a boxing perspective

Rafe Bartholomew @Rafeboogs

Here's the whole ride:
$24K at Harper's, 2009-11
$63K at Grantland/ESPN, 20110-13
$88K at Grantland/ESPN, 2013-15
$70K at Eater, 2018-19
$85K at The Athletic, 2019-20
$70K, no benefits at Texas Monthly, 2020-2025
$67K at The Athletic, 2025-present

Let’s be honest, Herbstreit’s dog would rather be at home napping. herbie got some deep issues

#WWE signs pact with Western Australia for PLEs https://mmapayout.com/2026/08/27/wwe-signs-pact-with-western-australia-for-ples/ #

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

I really did want tickets to UFC 332 in SLC…. But how tf are you charging this much for a card with no Main or Co-Main event? Not a fucking chance buddy 😂

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Here's the whole ride:
$24K at Harper's, 2009-11
$63K at Grantland/ESPN, 20110-13
$88K at Grantland/ESPN, 2013-15
$70K at Eater, 2018-19
$85K at The Athletic, 2019-20
$70K, no benefits at Texas Monthly, 2020-2025
$67K at The Athletic, 2025-present

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports