• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Oscar De La Hoya pens op-ed opposing TKO-backed Ali Act legislation

November 18, 2025 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Former boxer and current promoter Oscar De La Hoya wrote an opinion editorial in the Las Vegas Review-Journal opposing the Muhammad Ali Boxing Revival Act which is being backed by TKO and specifically Zuffa Boxing.

De La Hoya had targeted Dana White about the attempts to amend the Ali Act and the alleged “fight-fixing” issue in a social media post. This op-ed did not lodge any personal attack but made pointed arguments on how the proposed legislation would hurt fighters.

The Ali Act of 2000 was one of the few federal laws ever passed to protect athletes rather than corporations. It barred promoters from acting as managers, required disclosure of finances and empowered state commissions to act as independent referees for fairness and safety. The new legislation would gut that framework. Fighters would lose bargaining freedom, independent sanctioning bodies would be marginalized and the open marketplace that keeps the sport honest would collapse into monopoly.

De La Hoya refers to the Universal Boxing Organization (UBO) which Zuffa Boxing would like to create. The UBO would create an alternative to the current landscape in boxing. In it, the UBO would be able to act as promoter and matchmaker. What many fighters who oppose the act argue is that this would lead to coercive contracts and eliminate any bargaining leverage that a fighter may have. Most fighters point to the UFC antitrust lawsuits as examples of what happens under a UBO-like scheme as the UFC business practices.

De La Hoya also argues that the proposed legislation is contrary to what Muhammad Ali stood for.

“Muhammad Ali fought for autonomy, dignity and the right to control his own career. To attach his name to a bill that would concentrate power in corporate hands is a moral inversion of everything he stood for.”

Payout Perspective:

The article also calls for the UFC to be investigated by the State of Nevada based on the questions of fight fixing. He also called for there to be hearings on the Ali Act prior to a vote on the bill. It is interesting that this was put out in the Las Vegas Review Journal which also reports on the UFC. White takes these things personal and you can predict a response by White or someone with TKO to respond to De La Hoya’s opinion piece. Despite the fact that the California State Athletic Commission has pledged it support to the new law, it does not mean that it will pass.

Filed Under: Ali Act, boxing, Featured, legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Wolfe downgrades TKO after strong rally

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

For the first time, here's a link to "Private Equity in College Sports," written by @SunealBedi, John Holden and myself, and forthcoming in Volume 111 of @MinnesotaLawRev:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6349318

Failed MMA fighter, but successful plumber and drafter of a cut and paste version of the mUhammAD aLi act takes over of Homeland Security

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Kristi, you’re fired!

(Yes, I had this ready)

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports