• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Report on the distribution of net settlement fund in Le-Zuffa antirust settlement

September 7, 2025 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Last week, a settlement report was provided to the Court in the settlement of the Cung Le-Zuffa antitrust lawsuit. The mandatory report provided an update on the distribution of the agreed upon $375 million settlement between the plaintiffs and defendants in the case.

Communications were sent out to members of the class identified in the Le lawsuit based on the time that the athletes participated in the UFC and how many fights they were involved in under the UFC promotion.

The report indicates that 1,121 Class Members were eligible to participate in the Settlement.

According to the court appointed settlement coordinator, it received 1,088 claims from members of the class. A footnote to the report indicated that it approved one claim that was submitted after the deadline. Members of the class had the opportunity to contest their “pre-determined Event Compensation and Number of Bouts information.” There were 37 athletes that contested the event compensation and/or number of bouts information. Of the 37, only 9 provided sufficient documentation to support an adjusted amount for their Event Compensation to be adjusted.

Of the $375M settlement, the report includes the interest earned from the settlement as well as deductions for attorneys fees, claims administrator fees, et al.

Payout Perspective:

Notably, 33 individuals that were members of the class did not apply to receive compensation. We see that the lawyers involved in the Le lawsuit were paid $126 million which would roughly be 30% of the gross settlement. Also, the settlement carves out the settlement for Nate Quarry which totaled $1.25M. You might recall Quarry’s fights occurred prior to the class period and he only had an intellectual property claim which was dismissed.

Filed Under: Antitrust Class Action, Featured, Le v. Zuffa, legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit file statement prior to status conference

Despite two big losses, TKO touts another solid quarter

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Plaintiffs file Answering Brief in Cirkunov Antitrust Appeal

Jai Opetaia files a lawsuit against IBF

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

“Forced to be a backup” just put the agent sponsored fries in the bag bro

You can’t fire the players, you have to fire the managers

The Seattle Times @seattletimes

The ire of the fanbase and the blame for the team’s struggles have centered on Mariners manager Dan Wilson. But here’s why a change doesn’t seem likely. https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/mariners/why-mariners-are-unlikely-to-fire-dan-wilson-despite-disappointing-season/?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=owned_echobox_tw_m&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1786415821-1

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

These ex nba players declaring that they’re women and trying to get in the 2027 draft is F’n weird!!!!

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Hey Mariners — bring up Kade Anderson you dumb dinks.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Never change, Marshawn lmao 💀

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports