• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Report on the distribution of net settlement fund in Le-Zuffa antirust settlement

September 7, 2025 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Last week, a settlement report was provided to the Court in the settlement of the Cung Le-Zuffa antitrust lawsuit. The mandatory report provided an update on the distribution of the agreed upon $375 million settlement between the plaintiffs and defendants in the case.

Communications were sent out to members of the class identified in the Le lawsuit based on the time that the athletes participated in the UFC and how many fights they were involved in under the UFC promotion.

The report indicates that 1,121 Class Members were eligible to participate in the Settlement.

According to the court appointed settlement coordinator, it received 1,088 claims from members of the class. A footnote to the report indicated that it approved one claim that was submitted after the deadline. Members of the class had the opportunity to contest their “pre-determined Event Compensation and Number of Bouts information.” There were 37 athletes that contested the event compensation and/or number of bouts information. Of the 37, only 9 provided sufficient documentation to support an adjusted amount for their Event Compensation to be adjusted.

Of the $375M settlement, the report includes the interest earned from the settlement as well as deductions for attorneys fees, claims administrator fees, et al.

Payout Perspective:

Notably, 33 individuals that were members of the class did not apply to receive compensation. We see that the lawyers involved in the Le lawsuit were paid $126 million which would roughly be 30% of the gross settlement. Also, the settlement carves out the settlement for Nate Quarry which totaled $1.25M. You might recall Quarry’s fights occurred prior to the class period and he only had an intellectual property claim which was dismissed.

Filed Under: Antitrust Class Action, Featured, Le v. Zuffa, legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports