• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Poirier fight back on after social media gaffe

February 6, 2024 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

The UFC avoided a huge disappointment when Dustin Poirier announced that he would be fighting Benoit St. Denise

Dustin stated in a social media post that he could not come to an agreement with the UFC on a deal to fight in Miami at UFC 299.  Notably, the UFC announced the fight in a social media post on January 10th.  Thus, it would seem that the fight was announced prior to signing of bout agreements. 

My fights off but still working 👊 pic.twitter.com/DRG61CJySA

— The Diamond (@DustinPoirier) February 1, 2024

The post by Poirier sent some fans into shock and MMA media into suspicious mode.  Understandably, it would seem odd that the company would announce a fight when the camps had yet to confirm it.  But, you may infer that some fans purchased tickets with the knowledge that Poirier was fighting in Miami.  Hence, false advertising?

That same day, Poirier posted a “mea culpa” saying that he hadn’t been in contact with his manager (subtle blame spreading) and that his fight was on against BSD and he’d be ready in Miami.

Sorry folks, I jumped the gun, I couldn't get a hold of my manager for a few days. I just spoke with him and Hunter. Misunderstanding on my part. Fight is on! See you March 9th Miami!!! pic.twitter.com/oPriv0dMQq

— The Diamond (@DustinPoirier) February 1, 2024

Notably, the same day, Dana White went after Brazilian journalist Guilherme Cruz for contacting Benoit Saint Denis.

From Poirier’s perspective, it was an odd way of negotiating if it was negotiating. Did Poirier really not hear from his manager for a few days…Even if that was the case, the fight was originally announced on or about January 10th. Poirier’s tweet was on February 1st.

Filed Under: UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC 330 Payout Perspective

Update on CSI Entertainment – Mayweather lawsuit, Injunction request withdrawn

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit file statement prior to status conference

Despite two big losses, TKO touts another solid quarter

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

😂🤣😂

Dan Canobbio @DanCanobbio

The Money Team Law Firm

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

#Zuffa filed its Reply Brief in its appeal to the 9th Circuit in the Cirkunov antitrust lawsuit. Appeal is based on district court's decision to determine whether defendants held monopoly/monopsony power and whether the contract clauses were unsconsionable #UFC

2

The mysterious $11M man or woman #UFC https://mmapayout.com/2026/08/26/the-mysterious-11m-man-or-woman/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Thank you Seattle for the privilege. How often can anyone buy a Super Bowl winning team? Humbled.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports