• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Jericho files trademark for Painmaker gimmick

December 10, 2021 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Chris Jericho has filed a trademark with the USPTO for his Painmaker gimmick. The last time Jericho used the gimmick was against Nick Gage in AEW this past July. 

The application was filed December 6th. 

via @TimberlakeLaw

The description of the mark states that it, “consists of a full figure design of a character comprising a fedora, a leather jacket having spikes protruding therefrom, a scarf, and a painted face. 

The owner of the mark is Chris Irvine, Inc. (Jericho’s real surname).  He identifies several categories in which he plans to use the Painmaker mark.

It is identified to be used in the future for “Downloadable image files containing trading cards, artwork, photos, or memes authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing artwork, text, audio, and video relating to trading cards, artwork, photos, or memes authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs)”

It is also identified to be used for hats, shirts, bandanas, sweatshirts and hooded sweatshirts.

He also identified the use of “Entertainment in the nature of wrestling contests.” He identifies this good and/or service as being used as early as June 2018.

Payout Perspective:

You may recall Jericho using this gimmick in Japan and then his latest use was this past summer.  It looks like when he plans to return to the wrestling ring he will use the gimmick to sell merchandise which it appears will include NFTs.  This is a good move for Jericho as he has developed a character and his identifiable mark should distinguish from others as well as protect his look from others.  Its relatively new for professional wrestlers to protect their brand but it’s a smart thing to do to ensure that they can commercially take advantage of something they have developed and protect it from those that may pirate the look or gimmick. 

Filed Under: AEW, legal, pro wrestling

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Opetaia fires back at IBF in opposition to MTD

UFC 331 Payout Perspective

UFC 331 attendance, gate and bonuses

Scott Coker is back with Ki MMA

TKO owns this weekend

Appeals Court sets date for oral argument in Zuffa appeal

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

For the few that are following the William Keane lawsuit against #TopRank #Boxing the Court finally issued an order denying the Motion to Dismiss @DanRafael1 @EzRawBoxing @Boxing_Tribune

Debate between colleagues fail to show any difference via @nwasianweekly

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Do Guardian Caps actually prevent concussions? @ChrisNowinski1 tells @PabloTorre why the story "appears to be a bit of a scam":

"[The NFL's] own published study showed it wasn't true."

"They love that the public sees the Guardian Caps because it's basically virtue-signaling."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

#UFC332 attendance and gate were a serious drop from previous #UFC numbered events at the Delta Center https://mmapayout.com/2026/10/04/ufc-332-attendance/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

A truly mortifying decision.

Beyond disrespectful to generations of Murrow college alumnus. A reprehensible decision motivated purely by greed and a disregard for the integrity of journalism. Damaging the credibility of degrees earned by hard-working and passionate students.

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports