• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Jericho files trademark for Painmaker gimmick

December 10, 2021 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Chris Jericho has filed a trademark with the USPTO for his Painmaker gimmick. The last time Jericho used the gimmick was against Nick Gage in AEW this past July. 

The application was filed December 6th. 

via @TimberlakeLaw

The description of the mark states that it, “consists of a full figure design of a character comprising a fedora, a leather jacket having spikes protruding therefrom, a scarf, and a painted face. 

The owner of the mark is Chris Irvine, Inc. (Jericho’s real surname).  He identifies several categories in which he plans to use the Painmaker mark.

It is identified to be used in the future for “Downloadable image files containing trading cards, artwork, photos, or memes authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing artwork, text, audio, and video relating to trading cards, artwork, photos, or memes authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs)”

It is also identified to be used for hats, shirts, bandanas, sweatshirts and hooded sweatshirts.

He also identified the use of “Entertainment in the nature of wrestling contests.” He identifies this good and/or service as being used as early as June 2018.

Payout Perspective:

You may recall Jericho using this gimmick in Japan and then his latest use was this past summer.  It looks like when he plans to return to the wrestling ring he will use the gimmick to sell merchandise which it appears will include NFTs.  This is a good move for Jericho as he has developed a character and his identifiable mark should distinguish from others as well as protect his look from others.  Its relatively new for professional wrestlers to protect their brand but it’s a smart thing to do to ensure that they can commercially take advantage of something they have developed and protect it from those that may pirate the look or gimmick. 

Filed Under: AEW, legal, pro wrestling

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports