• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Seeking trilogy with Fury, Wilder forces mediation

November 11, 2020 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

The Athletic is reporting that Deontay Wilder is initiating a dispute resolution provision in the contract with Tyson Fury to force a third fight in the trilogy.  Mediation on the matter is set to begin this week.

According to Wilder, mediation over the matter is the process which is to settle this dispute per the terms of the contract.  Somewhat confusing in the story is that a retired judge is set to be the mediator but also a part of a binding arbitration.  Technically speaking, mediation is not binding.  Parties can enter into binding arbitration.  One would surmise that the contract may not have two alternative dispute resolution clauses.

After Fury’s defeat of Wilder in their second fight this past February, Wilder exercised his right to a rematch to force a trilogy fight with Fury.   The fight was to take place in mid-July and allowed for a 90-day delay for injury if needed.  This past March, the fight was moved to the fall due to the coronavirus pandemic.   

However, Fury’s side argues that the rematch clause does not continue forever. He agreed to allow a delay until December but claims that he cannot wait any longer for the rematch as he awaits a two-fight series with Anthony Joshua which they anticipate will happen in early 2021. 

Payout Perspective:

The contractual language as well as the external forces of the pandemic may play a part in the decision by the mediator and/or arbitrator.  While there is the suggestion that Fury could offer Wilder “step-aside” money, its unlikely that he would take it as its clear Wilder wants another shot at Fury.  If he were to take the money, it would be unlikely that the two sides would come to an agreement on another fight in the future.  From Fury’s perspective, since he beat Wilder, his motivation is less to fight Wilder again as he sees that he has nothing to gain and more to lose in a third fight.  With an Anthony Joshua fight on the horizon, a loss to Wilder could delay a big money two-fight series with Joshua. 

Filed Under: boxing, legal

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Plaintiffs file Answering Brief in Cirkunov Antitrust Appeal

Jai Opetaia files a lawsuit against IBF

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court

Plaintiffs highlight outstanding discovery in Johnson antitrust case

UFC 329 Payout Perspective

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Were all four satisfied in the Senate version? #TKO #AliAct #Zuffa #ZuffaBoxing #Boxing

Ariel Helwani @arielhelwani

Nico Ali Walsh breaks down the four major changes he wants included in the revised Zuffa Boxing Revival Act:

"In layman's terms, financial transparency is absolutely essential—UBO disclosures, fighter pay. You've got to be able to show what money is being made.

Free agency.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Re: Haney/Davis

The WBO congratulates Top Rank, Inc. on securing the promotional rights for the WBO Welterweight Championship contest between Devin Haney and Keyshawn Davis with a winning purse bid of $8,550,000.

Purse Distribution:
• Devin Haney: $6,412,500 (75%)
• Keyshawn

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

@MMAPayout “Sad to see once great publication like NYT become yellow pages.”

A little too on the nose while tweeting from the official Ring account

The Trumpification of the press

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

This is a totally normal thing for a boxing outlet to post.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports