• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Nick Diaz accepts one-year USADA ban…which ends next week

April 9, 2018 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

USADA announced that Nick Diaz has accepted a one-year sanction for Whereabouts Failures reporting pursuant to the UFC Anti-Doping Policy.  The suspension is retroactive to April 19th of last year and thus he will be available to fight by next week.

Via USADA release:

USADA announced today that Nick Diaz, of Stockton, Calif., has accepted a one-year sanction for a violation of the UFC® Anti-Doping Policy resulting from three unsuccessful test attempts during a 12-month period.

Like all UFC athletes, Diaz, 34, is a member of the UFC Registered Testing Pool and is therefore subject to certain Whereabouts responsibilities, which allow him to be located for out-of-competition testing. Diaz failed to be available for three tests at the locations provided in his Whereabouts Filings. The first two failures occurred in the second and third quarters of 2016, while the third occurred in the first quarter of 2017. Under the UFC Anti-Doping Policy, the accumulation of three Whereabouts Failures within a 12-month period constitutes an anti-doping policy violation.

Payout Perspective:

The announcement could be due to the timing of the investigation and speaking with Diaz’s representatives on the matter.  If not, this sort of announcement is a mockery of the UFC Anti-Doping Policy as the announcement almost coincides with his ability to get back to active status with the UFC.  While its clear that Diaz could not take a fight since he did not report his Whereabouts on three separate occasions in as 12-month span, the length of time it took for the decision seems lengthy.  If it was not due to a delay in fact-finding, one has to wonder why the investigation process and determination of penalty is taking so long.

Filed Under: Flagged by USADA, UFC, USADA

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Plaintiffs file Answering Brief in Cirkunov Antitrust Appeal

Jai Opetaia files a lawsuit against IBF

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court

Plaintiffs highlight outstanding discovery in Johnson antitrust case

UFC 329 Payout Perspective

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

WWE merger lawsuit settlement details disclosed in 10-Q:

"WWE's portion of the overall settlement amount is $105.0 million, which is expected to be funded by probable insurance recoveries of $75M, resulting in an expected loss of $30M"

TKO beats analyst expectations with busy Q2 period

So you are saying its a 2-for-1

boosie badazz pardon approval team @scrohto

Poop has been traded for INF prospect Pee

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

TKO Group Holdings released their Q2 results. UFC revenue up $120 million compared to Q2 last year. https://investor.tkogrp.com/news/news-details/2026/TKO-Reports-Second-Quarter-2026-Results/default.aspx

#Mayweather argues that CSI has not established that "alleged difficulty collecting a possible unsecured contract judgment is a legally cognizable basis for the prelim injunction it seeks."

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports