• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Korean Zombie sues Venum over use of his name

March 7, 2018 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

The Korean Zombie, also known as UFC star Chan-Sung Jung filed a lawsuit for trademark infringement in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

According to the complaint, Jung has filed a lawsuit against DBV Distribution, Inc. which appears to be the company which owns the MMA brand Venum.  Jung alleges that he was approached by the defendants with the possibility of licensing his trademark, Korean Zombie for use on its apparel.  Jung has held the trademark since January 2013 having used it since June 2007.

He claims that in December 2013 and January 2014, defendants approached Jung about the license.  However, Jung states that he “unequivocally rejected” the proposals through his representatives.  Nevertheless, in January 2018, t-shirts and other products bearing “Venum Zombie” appeared for sale.

KZ’s reps sent a cease and desist letter on February 8, 2018 but had not received a response.  The lawsuit was filed on February 27, 2018.  The lawsuit alleges trademark infringement, Jung’s right of publicity, unauthorized commercial use of likeness and unfair competition under the Lanham Act.

Complaint by JASONCRUZ206 on Scribd

H/t: NorCal Record via Alexandra Roberts

Payout Perspective:

The timeline on the communications seem as though there was a huge gap between January 2014 and January 2018 which seems to need more explanation.  Jung did serve in the military for South Korea from 2014-2016.  He has returned to the UFC since then.  But, that does not explain Venum’s use of the name and likeness which seems to be the case.  Venum may argue that the use of “Zombie” does not necessarily refer to Jung and that is within the purview of Fair Use.  However, evidence of having a license rejected and then using Zombie seems like bad facts.  Of course, there is another side to the story which we should hear from Venum.

Filed Under: Featured, legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Plaintiffs seeking $270K from Dominance MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Plaintiffs have filed a reply in support of its motion for attorney fees. Notably right after motion was filed Dominance provided document responses. However, Plaintiffs claim the document responses are still not complete #Zuffa #TKO #UFC #antitrust #sportslaw

3

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request #UFC #TKO #ZUFFA #Antitrust #MMA https://mmapayout.com/2026/04/28/dominance-responds-to-plaintiffs-fee-request/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

TODAY, on the 59th anniversary of my grandfather taking a stand for what he believed in and refusing induction, we made meaningful progress with Senators on the Ali Revival Act.

Fighters, your rights are on the line. Speak up.

Uniform compliance pay?

Home of Fight @Home_of_Fight

😬💰 Arman Tsarukyan says the UFC randomly sent him $42,000 bonus recently:

"I don't know what is it for. Maybe for my social media work. But they never tell. Otherwise my manager would ask for percentage."

🎥 @PBDsPodcast

This rivals the Jon Jones 1 day in rehab

Adam @zandermercury

6 years of cheating fixed by missing 1 day of work

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports